Chitika

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Lawyer: French attacks suspect claimed innocence

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
PARIS (AP) — An Algerian lawyer said Monday that she has evidence the young man accused of killing seven people in attacks on French soldiers and a Jewish school claimed his innocence to police. Separately, France announced it was expelling several foreign Islamist extremists on its soil.

Mohamed Merah, 23, was killed after a more than 30-hour standoff with police at his apartment in Toulouse after being identified as the suspect behind the killing spree last month. Authorities have said that during negotiations Merah claimed to have links to al-Qaida and confessed to the killings.

But Zahia Mokhtari, a lawyer for Merah's Algerian father, told BFM television on Monday that she had two identical videos of Merah that contradict the police narrative. "In these videos, he says, 'I am innocent. Why are you killing me? I didn't do anything,'" she said.

Mokhtari would not detail how she got the videos, saying she would reveal more on their origin once she files a lawsuit in French courts against the elite police force, RAID, that killed Merah.

Merah is alleged to have killed three paratroopers, a rabbi and three Jewish schoolchildren, attacks that put French authorities on edge. President Nicolas Sarkozy vowed a crackdown on foreign Islamist radicals, and the Interior Ministry said Monday that deportations are in progress.

An Algerian Islamist radical convicted for a role in 1994 attacks in Marrakech and said to have recently started linking up again with extremists was deported Monday along with an imam from Mali who preached anti-Semitism and the rejection of the West, the Interior Ministry said.

A Saudi imam who has systematically preached the need to isolate women among other things is to be forced home imminently. Efforts to deport two other people are in progress and more such actions can be expected "shortly," the statement said.

A police official with knowledge of the investigation into the Merah case cast doubt on the Algerian lawyer's claims about the videos Monday, noting that Merah led police to evidence that proved he was the perpetrator.

Prosecutors say Merah spoke at length with negotiators from the RAID force throughout the standoff while he was holed up in a Toulouse apartment.

During these conversations, authorities say, Merah told them where to find a video he took of the crime spree. Al-Jazeera television has said it received a copy of the video, which shows the deaths of three paratroopers, three Jewish children and a rabbi from the killer's point of view.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of police rules, added that Merah had toyed with police during the standoff, initially agreeing to surrender but later vowing to "die with his weapons in his hands."

Police have said that Merah said he had links to al-Qaida but have cast doubt on that claim. They are holding his brother on suspicion he helped to prepare the attacks and are looking for a possible third man who may also have been involved.

The killings have left France reeling, reviving worries about Islamist extremism and shaking up the French presidential campaign.

___

Associated Press writer Jamey Keaten contributed to this report.


View the original article here

Sacramento Personal Injury Lawyers to Open Demas Law Group - PR Web (press release)

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Sacramento, California (PRWEB) March 30, 2012

A team of Sacramento injury attorneys embarks on a new course by forming the Demas Law Group. The firm began operation under this name in March of 2012. The firm's primary mission is to serve the Sacramento community in a wide array of personal injury matters. The firm is comprised of Sacramento personal injury attorneys who have decades of collective experience helping injured clients in California.

The Demas Law Group will be led by John N. Demas. Mr. Demas has successfully handled personal injury cases in the Sacramento area for twenty years, including wrongful death, catastrophic injury and defective products claims. He has represented victims of automobile, trucking, and construction accidents. Mr. Demas has earned a reputation with attorneys, clients, and insurance companies alike as a vigilant advocate for injured victims. His skill and expertise have led to some of the largest verdicts in Sacramento County history. He has been selected by his peers as a Northern California Super Lawyer for 2009, 2010, and 2011, an exclusive honor limited to less than 5% of all attorneys, and approximately 1% of plaintiff personal injury attorneys. He was recently recognized as the Trial Lawyer/Advocate of the Year by the Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association, in recognition for his extraordinary trial results and intrepid work in advocating the rights of consumers. In addition, Mr. Demas has been granted membership to The American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), and has a 10/10 rating, the highest possible rating, with the prominent attorney ranking web site, Avvo.com. He is also a member of The Justice Roundtable, an organization consisting of 100 of the nation’s top personal injury attorneys.

The Demas Law Group is committed to achieving the best possible results for its clients. Its primary objective is to serve the members of the community through open communication, compassion, and strong ethical values. The personal injury attorneys at Demas Law Group offer specialized legal skills, experience and diligence and devote all their resources to providing exceptional legal representation and personal service. Their track record of success includes numerous seven-figure settlements and verdicts, and has earned them accolades from their peers and community.

The Demas Law Group has received an "AV" rating, the highest possible national rating from Martindale-Hubbell. In addition, the firm has been given the highest marks for "adherence to professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability and diligence."



View the original article here

San Diego Personal Injury Lawyers at Morris and Associates Settle California ... - San Francisco Chronicle (press release)

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

View the original article here

Compensationclaims.com - What is involved in the compensation claims process

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Have you suffered an injury or been involved in an accident? Did the injury occur as a result of another’s negligence or intent? If so, there is a good chance you’re entitled to compensation.

An accident can be a traumatic experience and injuries can have a major impact on your quality of life. Accidents give rise to physical pain, emotional and psychological suffering, and stressful financial troubles. Whether your injuries are long term or short term, if another party is responsible for impacting your life in such a way, it is unquestionable that you be compensated.

Step 1: Contact Us

The first step to getting what you deserve is contacting us. You can either give us a call or submit your name and number so that our trained advisors can contact you. Together, we will discuss the precise details of your accident and injuries. The information you provide will help us determine whether or not you have a strong claim and a good chance of success.

Step 2: Find an Injury Solicitor

Once we’ve determined that you have a legitimate case, we can connect you with a knowledgeable personal injury solicitor with experience handling your type of claim. You’re personal injury solicitor will guide you through the compensation process with ease. Our injury solicitors know exactly what it takes to put together a solid case with the best chances of success.

You can trust your injury lawyers to do all the legal legwork and fill out any of the necessary paperwork on your behalf. Even more, most of the claims we deal with are taken on, on a No Win No Fee basis. This means that if you lose your case, you won’t be out any money. More importantly, if you’re successful in your claim, you’ll receive full compensation.

Step 3: Provide Evidence

Your lawyer will need some information from you in order to bring forward a strong and substantial case. Work with him or her to provide evidence of your injuries as well as proof that fault lies on the opposing side. Providing evidence such as medical records, expert testimony and an account of lost wages all help to prove the merit of your case. Your injury solicitor will use this information and appeal to the relevant laws to strengthen your case.

If you’ve been involved in an accident and have sustained injuries as a result of another’s negligence or willful intent, you have every right to claim for compensation. If you’d like to know more about the compensation claims process or speak to one of our No Win No Fee solicitors, don’t hesitate to contact us today.


View the original article here

Olbermann casts light, lawyer on Current TV split - The Associated Press

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Olbermann casts light, lawyer on Current TV splitBy LYNN ELBER, AP Television Writer – 2 hours ago?

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Keith Olbermann said he "screwed up" by taking a job with Current TV, but he plans to make the channel pay for firing him.

In Olbermann's first TV interview since he was dismissed last week by Current, he was asked by David Letterman to assess his chances of getting any money due him. After reportedly signing a five-year, $50 million contract with Current, he was there less than a year.

Olbermann referred back to Conan O'Brien's legal battle with NBC over "The Tonight Show," which ended with a reported $45 million exit settlement for O'Brien. "She's my lawyer," Olbermann said, smiling.

Entertainment attorney Patricia Glaser represented O'Brien during his severance fight.

During his appearance Tuesday on CBS' "Late Show," Olbermann compared himself to an expensive chandelier that ended up without a good home because of problems at Current — and his failure to see them.

"I screwed up really big on this. Let's just start there," Olbermann said. But he wasn't the only one, he indicated, offering a home-building analogy.

"It's my fault that it didn't succeed in the sense that I didn't think the whole thing through. I didn't say, 'You know, if you buy a $10 million chandelier, you should have a house to put it in. Just walking around with a $10 million chandelier isn't going to do anybody a lot of good, and it's not going to do any good to the chandelier."

Letterman sought clarification.

"You're the chandelier?" he asked. Yes, his guest replied.

The studio for his show, "Countdown," was inadequate, Olbermann claimed, and he lost access to a car service because of an unpaid bill. He denied that he had skipped taking part in key political coverage earlier this year because he was upset over production problems.

Instead, he said, he was "fighting something in my throat" and had been told by his physician to remain silent for five days to resolve the problem.

Olbermann stopped short of directing criticism at former Vice President Al Gore, Current TV's co-founder.

"He meant well. It didn't go well," Olbermann said. "He just wasn't that involved in it and it was kind of difficult to get to him on these things."

But he took a slap at Current co-founder and CEO Joel Hyatt, saying that "television was something of a challenge for him."

While he quickly realized he'd made a mistake joining Current, Olbermann said, he stayed out of loyalty to viewers and his staff.

Last Friday, Current TV announced it was immediately replacing Olbermann's show with a new program hosted by former New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer. In a statement, Gore and Hyatt said their relationship with Olbermann no longer reflected respect and other values.

Olbermann fired back online, saying the claims would be proven untrue in legal action he intended to pursue.

The at-times volatile host came to Current last June after a stormy eight-year stint at MSNBC, his second at that network, and an abrupt departure in January 2011.

Copyright ? 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.


View the original article here

Lawyer calls on pageant to scrap 'abhorrent' gender rule

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

The lawyer for a transgender Miss Universe Canada hopeful is calling on the pageant to clarify whether her client will be allowed to compete, and to scrap the "abhorrent" rule excluding others like her.

Jenna Talackova, 23, was named among 65 Miss Universe Canada finalists last month, only to be disqualified days later after news broke online that she had undergone sexual reassignment surgery.

"Jenna was being eliminated as a contestant not because she lacked beauty or charisma, but because, according to pageant representatives, she was not a ‘naturally born' woman," said famed feminist lawyer Gloria Allred, who is representing Talackova in the U.S.

After an outpouring of public support for the 6-1 tall blond, the pageant issued a statement Monday indicating Talackova could compete only "provided she meets the legal gender recognition requirements of Canada, and the standards established by other international competitions."

But Allred, who recently represented Tiger Woods mistresses Rachel Uchitel and Joslyn James, says the Donald Trump-owned beauty contest has only managed to confuse the issue.

"Instead of stating clearly that Jenna will be allowed to compete, Mr. Trump qualifies it by adding conditions that are ambiguous," Allred said at a Tuesday press conference in Los Angeles.

"We are asking Mr. Trump to step up and be a leader in the fight against discrimination. Or would he prefer to hide behind other organizations and say that if they discriminate, so can he?"

Talackova's Canadian driver's licence, passport and even birth certificate indicate that she is a woman, Allred said.

The pageant said it disqualified the beauty queen because she lied on her application when asked if she was born female. Talackova, who appeared on camera Tuesday for the first time since the controversy arose, says the rule amounts to blatant discrimination, and should be removed.

"I also want Mr. Trump to clearly state that this rule will be eliminated," Talackova said. "I do not want any other woman to suffer the discrimination that I have to endure."

"I am a woman… I have never asked for any special consideration. I only wanted to compete."

Trump responds

Trump told gossip program TMZ in a phone interview after the conference ended that Talackova would unequivocally be allowed to compete if she so chooses.

"We go by the law, and based on the laws she's able to compete if she wants to. She can take her shot, she can maybe win and maybe she won't win," he said.

The billionaire businessman refused to apologize for Talackova's initial disqualification, however.

"There'll be no apology whatsoever," he said. "Frankly, if she competes that's wonderful and if she doesn't want to compete because maybe she thinks she can't win that's fine also, I couldn't care less."

The controversy has been a boon to Miss Universe Canada ticket sales, Trump added.

Talackova has previously represented Canada at Miss International Queen, a transsexual beauty pageant in Thailand, where she placed as a finalist.

In an interview posted on YouTube, she describes herself as having identified as a woman at four-years-old, beginning hormone therapy at 14. She had her reassignment operation at 19.


View the original article here

Monday, April 2, 2012

Injury lawyers: compensation culture driven by insurance companies - Insurance Daily

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Russell Thomson from The Injury Lawyers explains how insurance companies are driving compensation culture for whiplash claims in a bid to chase referral fees. More from the injury lawyers injury claims website: The?Injury Lawyers.

Whiplash claims, whiplash compensation, whiplash injuries – or Whiplash Cash, Whiplash Epidemic, and “the weakest necks in Britain” as the press often title it; whiplash has not escaped the news over the last decade as compensation claims continue to rise together with our car insurance premiums as well.

It’s obvious to anyone that it’s all getting way out of hand!

But what’s the reality behind all this? What can we do to solve the problem? We often hear in the news from the insurance companies complaining about higher volumes of claims causing premiums to rise. We absolutely love a good scandal here in the UK – making one out of whiplash is just way too easy to do.

So, why are the government wanting to crack down so hard on whiplash? Are we facing a real compensation culture? And what should be done about whiplash claims to solve the problem?

Let’s Face Facts – It’s a Hard Knock Economy…

As an economist by education, it’s easy for me to try and look at the bigger picture in these tight financial times. Let’s face it – we can’t afford to be paying out huge premiums for insurance. It makes anyone angry to think their premiums are going up and up; it makes me personally angry knowing I have to pay more and more! The insurers have been quick to answer our concerns – “the surge in whiplash claims is increasing everyone’s premiums!!!” All of our purse strings are as tight as we can pull them at the moment.

Naturally, the government want to do something about it. To be able to say to the people “we will take this whiplash problem seriously and do something about it to save all your premiums being too high” is a powerful political tool. We, the British people, like I said earlier, love a good a scandal; and generally like to have a good dig out our government whilst we’re at it! When they turn round and tell us they can save us some cash by solving what seems to be a huge problem in our society today, we’re quick to lap it up and prepare our ballot choices for the next election.

We call it “the compensation culture”. It’s a great catch phrase, isn’t it? But to really understand a problem, we have to delve a little deeper and try to understand what the underlying issues really are…

The Compensation Culture Explained

If you have read the government reports surrounding the Compensation Culture, namely the Lord Young and Lord Jackson reports, then you may well know what I’m going to say next. Amazingly, there is no such thing as a compensation culture! It’s actually a media fuelled myth that was formed in the wake of the whole whiplash problem I’m writing about now, together with the whole “where there’s a blame, there’s a claim” idea! Claims are on the rise, and insurance premiums are on the rise too – that natural assumption it’s because people are claiming left right and centre is the obvious conclusion we draw.

What we should be doing is looking deeper in to the underlying issues; the real problem. The first point of call is to ask one simple question – how has this all happened? How did we get ourselves in to this predicament? Answer this one easy question, and the answer is pretty simple to see.

Why are there more people claiming? Well, it’s safe to say that more people are aware that they have the right to make a claim for compensation, and will therefore use the human right they have to claim from a policy of insurance that covers injuries to third party victims. Which is a quick point in itself – insurance is there to cover people for damages, so why shouldn’t we claim from it??

There is certainly far more advertising for whiplash claims than there used to be. Aside from the adverts on the TV and the radio, type “Whiplash” in to Google or any other search engine and see the flood of results from companies offering you their services for a compensation claim.

But there is something far more sinister at work when it comes to whiplash claims. There is something out there that is the real reason why people are making more claims, including a minority making fraudulent ones. Its two simple words that are so powerful they have the ability, when utilised in the right way, to make millions and millions for companies that involve themselves in the practice. These two simple yet powerful words are “Referral Fees”?

Referral Fees – The Real Problem

The real reason why there are so many people being pushed in to making compensation claims is because of the practice of personal injury referral fees. Whiplash claims in many instances are relatively easy to win – a rear end collision accident is basically money just waiting to be earned by the solicitor who will take it on. This salient fact has been picked up on and turned in to one of the biggest money making schemes in the last century.?

If you hold the details of a whiplash accident victim, you are potentially holding £1,500.00 of legal fees in your hands. £1,500.00 is a fair bit of money. You approach anyone in the street and say to them “would you like £1,500.00?” and you’ll find the majority of people would be more than happy to oblige.

You tell a law firm that you can give them £1,500.00 for nothing and you would have one happy law firm. You tell them you can give them £1,500.00 in exchange for £800.00 and you still have a happy law firm. Can you see where I’m going with this?

The personal details of an accident victim who was not at fault in an incident is worth potentially a lot of money. Insurance companies, garages, breakdown and recovery firms, and the scrupulous claim and accident management companies have all clocked on to this; and they’re all making millions of pounds from it.

The most common one is Legal Expenses Insurance, or Motor Legal Protection as it’s sometimes called. The vast majority of people with a motor insurance policy will probably have this as an added extra, or will be physically paying for it as an addition to their insurance policy. Your insurance company will tell you that this vital addition to your policy means you have the benefit of legal insurance for a claim for compensation should you ever be in an accident.

Now, don’t get me wrong, it is a form of insurance; but when your insurers pass your details over to one of their panel of approved lawyers under the insurance scheme, they receive a healthy referral fee or administration fee for their troubles. Amazingly, this can be in the region of £800.00 to £1,000.00.

So, to break it down in extremely simple terms, if you have an accident and your insurers pass you over to a personal injury lawyer, your insurers could receive up to £1,000.00 for doing so. They are essentially “selling” your claim over to a law firm. Given that one of the first points of contact you make after an accident is to your own insurers, they can get the deal done there and then without delay; leaving the accident victim without the opportunity to even think about whether they are going to make or claim, nor who they might instruct to deal with a case.

If your insurers don’t catch it in time, the recovery firm you use may well also refer your details over to a law firm for a handsome payout instead – or the garage you take your car to, or even the police according to some sources in the past. Ultimately, anyone who knows about your accident can simply refer your details over to a claims company or a law firm and they can swoop your claim within hours or days.

I bought a new car and received a free “Accident Assistance” pack which basically told me to call this one helpline number if I am ever in an accident. Why? Because they will know right away if I have a claim and will be able to refer the case over to a lawyer for cold hard cash! You really can’t escape this nowadays; and you probably don’t even know it.

Now, let’s say for arguments sake this practice doesn’t exist. If it didn’t, the amount of people who would not even consider making a claim would be huge. Many wouldn’t even think about it at all! So it’s safe to say that the increase in claims is actually down to the fact that insurers and anyone else involved in the road accident process are pushing people in to claims when they may well have never even considered making a claim until they are contacted by someone telling them they could claim thousands of pounds in compensation.

Hey – we’re in a recession! Who the hell wouldn’t accept the opportunity to get thousands of pounds for a compensation claim!?

Insurers Referral Fees Exposed – The Insurers “Dirty Little Secret”

As it so happens, this was all exposed in the media last year, which for independent law firms like us who do not, and never have, paid for claims by way of referral fees, is great news! The simple fact is that not all law firms buy claims from insurers and claims companies as we don’t believe in the practice whatsoever. All our clients come to us directly for our reputation after seeking advice about whether they can make a claim for the whiplash they are suffering.

Last year former Justice Secretary Mr Jack Straw brought to light and blasted what he has termed as the “huge racket” of insurers passing on details to personal injury lawyers for extortionate fees. The reports confirm that Mr Straw has said that “the practice had driven a surge in no-win, no-fee claims this year which put up premiums – all with the insurers’ knowledge”.

So, as you can see, it’s the insurers themselves that are akin to this apparent problem.

My own insurers tried to sell me Legal Expenses Insurance as part of my policy at least four times when I switched over to them. The lady simply persisted and persisted, putting me on hold several times whilst she, I assume, was telling her supervisor she was having difficulty selling it to me. In the end I told her outright “it’s my job to stop it; I work for an independent personal injury law firm and know all about the referral fee scams!” Her response in all honesty was classic – “oh… erm, never mind then…”

They did try again when I renewed. I got a call from a pleasant sounding young man asking if Id received my new policy documents through the post, before he quickly said “oh I’ve just noticed you don’t have legal protection on your policy, which is quite a problem for people if you have an accident”. It was 9:30am in the morning and I didn’t have the patience when I told him “the real problem is insurers selling peoples details to law firms for cash; I work for a law firm, so I think I’ll do without it thanks.”

It seems we are facing situations were insurers are so desperate to sell details to lawyers for claims, we are facing potentially fraudulent claims from pushy insurance companies. Whilst whiplash is a real and difficult injury to live with (I know, I’ve still got mine!), people are being pushed in to wrongfully cashing in on it.

Investigations from Mr Straw brought him to the Association of British Insurers, and two of the UK’s largest insurance companies, whom admitted to selling on their own customers personal details to solicitors for profit.

“I went to see the Association of British Insurers (ABI), and senior executives of two of Britain’s largest motor insurers,” Straw wrote in The Times.

“I asked them. A long pause, a look of embarrassment, then one of these executives said: ‘This is the industry’s dirty secret. It’s we, the insurance companies, who sell on this personal information.’?

“It is gobsmacking,” Straw said. “The insurers are complicit in something that is against their interests. In my view, what they are doing, in principle, is contrary to the spirit of data protection.”

The above, I believe, pretty much says it all.

Referral Fees to be Banned – Problem Solved?

Both the Law Society and the Bar Council have recommended in the past that referral fees be stopped on the grounds that they have the potential to limit access to justice and reduce the quality of legal services on offer.

Following news of the pending ban, Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly has also spoken out and confirmed “It’s certainly a racket. It’s a sick culture that we have to turn round.” The bill has been passed through government, and it is now just a matter of time before they are banned outright. This could help to solve the problem by reducing the amount of claims as people will not be pushed in to making a claim by insurers and companies looking to make a quick buck from selling their claim to a law firm.

Chairman of the Bar, Peter Lodder QC, has also spoken out, saying that referral fees have “no place in a fair and open justice system… They are bribes and add an unnecessary cost to litigation.”

Are you saying that the insurers are actually to blame for the surge in increased claims and premium rises then?

Yes. I am. I told you that whiplash claims and the rising compensation culture would be fully exposed. But what has been exposed is probably not quite what you expected to hear. Just look at the facts we have before us, and you tell me who is really to blame for all of this…

Category: Insurance Blog, Insurance News, Legal News


View the original article here

Egypt army pardons Brotherhood presidency nominee: lawyer - Reuters India

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Muslim Brotherhood's Mohammad Khairat al-Shater, walks into the courtroom in Cairo, Egypt, January 30, 2007. REUTERS/Nasser Nuri/Files

Muslim Brotherhood's Mohammad Khairat al-Shater, walks into the courtroom in Cairo, Egypt, January 30, 2007.

Credit: Reuters/Nasser Nuri/Files

By Marwa Awad

CAIRO | Sun Apr 1, 2012 10:46pm IST

CAIRO (Reuters) - Egypt's military has dropped two court convictions against the Muslim Brotherhood's new presidential candidate Khairat al-Shater, clearing him to run in the elections to replace ousted leader Hosni Mubarak, the movement's lawyer said on Sunday.

In a policy reversal on Saturday, the Brotherhood opted to field a candidate to contest the votes in May and June and named Shater, a wealthy businessman, as its choice after deciding the other candidates were not worthy of its support.

Shater, 61, was tried in a military court in 1995 and sentenced to five years in jail on charges of "reviving" the Brotherhood. He was also tried and convicted in 2007 on charges of providing university students with arms and training.

He was jailed for seven years in the 2007 case but was freed with many other Brotherhood members in 2011 after serving four and a half years of the sentence.

Under Egyptian law, former convicts cannot occupy official posts.

"All charges and cases against engineer Khairat al-Shater have been dropped," the Brotherhood's lawyer Abdel Moneim Abdel Maqsood told Reuters.

"Shater now has all the civil rights he was deprived of and can now exercise his political rights including running for an official post in the country," he said.

The military would not confirm this but one army source said the Brotherhood would not publicly name any candidate of its own without prior clearance from the ruling military council.

Abdel Maqsood said he had picked up presidential application papers on Shater's behalf from the electoral committee.

Mubarak's overthrow in February last year ended the Brotherhood's official exclusion from politics. Before that, its leaders were often rounded up by state security in what human rights groups said was a deliberate policy to curb their political reach.

The Brotherhood did not begin the protests that toppled Mubarak but has been their most obvious beneficiary, capitalising on a formidable grass-roots campaign machine to secure top spot in a recent parliamentary vote.

That puts Shater among the frontrunners in a race billed as Egypt's first free and fair election in six decades, even though others have months of unofficial canvassing under their belts.

Analysts said the decision to field a presidential candidate suggested the Brotherhood, now on the brink of power for the first time in its 84-year history, was worried it could have its newfound influence snatched away.

Shater's candidacy is likely to split the Islamist vote in the elections further. There are three other Islamist candidates running.

But liberals may still fret over Shater's bid as it signals the rising influence of Islamists after they swept parliament and now dominate an assembly writing a new constitution.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Sunday while visiting Istanbul that the United States will be watching Egypt's political process, urging political actors not to discriminate against minorities.

Many Coptic Christians, who represent around 10 percent of Egypt's population of over 80 million, have voiced concern over the rise of groups pledged to a stricter application of Islamic Sharia law.

(Editing by Tom Pfeiffer and David Stamp)


View the original article here

Philip Harnett Corboy, Jr. Receives Distinguished Alumnus Award from DePaul ... - EON: Enhanced Online News (press release)

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

CHICAGO--(EON: Enhanced Online News)--Corboy & Demetrio partner Philip Harnett Corboy, Jr. has received the 2012 Distinguished Alumnus Award from DePaul University College of Law. Philip “Flip” Corboy, Jr. is a 1977 graduate of the law school. Corboy was honored for his leadership roles in the legal community, his life-long charitable work and his 35 years of accomplishments as a trial lawyer.

“This is the highest distinction the College of Law can bestow. The award is to recognize alumni who have reached the pinnacle of their careers, maintaining a level of career excellence over their lifetime”

“This is the highest distinction the College of Law can bestow. The award is to recognize alumni who have reached the pinnacle of their careers, maintaining a level of career excellence over their lifetime,” according to Gregory Mark, Dean of DePaul University College of Law.

Flip Corboy is a past President of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association and a past President of the Board of Directors of the Legal Assistance Foundation of Chicago, the nation’s second largest legal aid agency. In 2002, Flip was inducted into the American College of Trial Lawyers, the nation’s pre-eminent, invitation-only organization of trial lawyers who are considered the best in their state.

Receiving the 2012 Distinguished Alumnus Award is just one of many accolades Flip Corboy has received for his accomplishments as a trial lawyer. Flip was named to Best Lawyers in America, 2012 Edition, in the area of personal injury litigation. This was the seventh year in a row Corboy received such an honor. His Chicago law firm, Corboy & Demetrio, was named to Best Law Firms in the Chicago metropolitan market by U.S. News, which publishes U.S. News & World Report.

Flip Corboy was given the elite designation of Illinois Super Lawyer for the eighth year in a row in 2012. Corboy was also named to The Top 100 Lawyers in Illinois by Illinois Super Lawyers for the fourth straight year.

In addition, Corboy has attained the prestigious designation of Leading Lawyer by the Leading Lawyers Network for nine consecutive years since the award’s inception.

Flip Corboy’s record of success is extensive. He has tried or settled more than 55 cases in which plaintiffs have recovered $1 million or more. Those successes include a $22.5 million settlement in 2011 for the family of a Rockford, Illinois, woman who died in a train derailment; an $18 million settlement for a Mexican national killed by piece of falling glass in downtown Chicago; a record-setting $17 million jury verdict for a brain-damaged victim who was knocked down by a limousine; an $11 million settlement for a Chicago dental student burned in an automobile fire; a record-setting $7 million settlement for a 78-year-old woman who was hurt when she was struck by an automatic door at Target; and a record-setting $4.5 million verdict for an Central Illinois couple who were passengers in a car that was hit by a pizza delivery car.

Throughout his career, Flip Corboy has demonstrated a strong commitment to public service. Before becoming a nationally-recognized personal injury lawyer, Flip spent seven years as Assistant State’s Attorney in the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office becoming a “first chair” prosecutor and prosecuting major felony cases.

Flip has also maintained a close relationship with the law school that educated him. Corboy sits on Dean’s Council at the DePaul University College of Law and serves on the board of DePaul University’s President's Club.

About Corboy & Demetrio

Corboy & Demetrio is one of the nation’s premier law firms. It represents individuals and their families in serious personal injury and wrongful death cases and is renowned for its achievements in the courtroom and for its contributions to the community. The rights and concerns of its clients are at the core of Corboy & Demetrio’s practice. That commitment, dedication, compassion and relentless drive has resulted in exceptional service and exceptional results for its clients. The firm has acquired more than $3 billion in settlements and verdicts and has attained almost 600 settlements and verdicts in excess of $1 million. To contact Flip Corboy or any of our Chicago personal injury lawyers, call 312-346-3191 or toll free at 800-356-3191. We are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. For more information about our law firm go to corboydemetrio.com.


View the original article here

Bales' lawyer: U.S. is 'hiding evidence' in massacre - Philadelphia Inquirer

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
SEATTLE - The attorney for the U.S. soldier accused of killing 17 Afghan civilians said Friday that the U.S. government was "hiding evidence" from the defense team.

John Henry Browne said members of the defense team in Afghanistan were told they would have access to witnesses at a hospital, but later discovered the people had been released.

He also said the U.S. government has not turned over files to the lawyers defending Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales.

The defense team said in a statement the prosecution was withholding information "while potential witnesses scatter."

"It's outrageous," Browne said. "What they are basically doing is hiding evidence. The only reason to hide evidence is if you don't have evidence."

Maj. Chris Ophardt, an Army spokesman, said in a statement that the prosecution would provide Bales' defense with evidence in accordance with court-martial and military rules of evidence. He said that within these guidelines "the prosecution is and has been communicating with the defense."

Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta, after speaking to hundreds of Marines and sailors aboard the USS Peleliu off the coast of San Diego, told reporters: "I've made very clear that those procedures will be followed and that he'll be entitled to whatever information he would be entitled to under the military code of justice."

At a news conference Friday, Browne said the military is not under a legal obligation to provide his team with certain information at this point, but they were led to believe they'd have more assistance.

He said being given access to information at a later date would not work, especially in regards to witnesses in Afghanistan.

"Normally, we have cooperation with prosecutors and we get information, and in this case they actually promised us if we sent people to Afghanistan . . . that they would cooperate," he said.

Browne also said the military planned to conduct a comprehensive mental-health evaluation of Bales at Fort Leavenworth, Kan.

Browne said the military initiated the evaluation and that it would take place within the next two months.

Bales has been charged with 17 counts of premeditated murder.


View the original article here

Lawyer-entrepreneur-candidate was really none of those

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

CLAYTON ? On the surface, Dustin C. Mitchell, Esq., seems like a solid candidate for the cover of a glossy business magazine.

A quick Internet search describes a millionaire entrepreneur heading several private companies, a lawyer who graduated from Washington University's law school and a political insider staging a run for lieutenant governor of Missouri.

His appearances in St. Louis County Circuit Court several times earlier this year, representing two men in four cases ranging from assault to driving while intoxicated, would seem to support that professional image. He even handed out business cards in the courthouse, promoting his legal practice and his range of courtroom experience.

But most of Mitchell's public persona appears false. Court records instead reveal a convicted felon with a trail of trouble and dubious claims. Authorities say he isn't a lawyer, and earlier this month charged him with one felony count of stealing by deceit for allegedly taking money to represent a St. Louis County man in court.

In that case, police say, he received $1,000 from the man and represented him on charges of drunken driving and speeding, and in a hearing to revoke that man's probation for an earlier crime.

If convicted, Mitchell, 31, faces up to seven years in prison. A grand jury will review the cases and consider additional charges, officials said.

In one of the other four cases, Mitchell represented an Arnold man accused of attacking a hospital security guard, court records show. In January, Mitchell persuaded a judge to reduce the bail and release the man from jail.

Authorities haven't seen that client since Mitchell was arrested. A judge issued a new warrant for the man's arrest, but police were still looking for him.

'MAKING A MESS'

Mitchell was tripped up when he represented himself in a small-claims lawsuit, said Paul Fox, St. Louis County's director of judicial administration. A limousine company had sued Mitchell, claiming he failed to pay more than $800 for driving him around in September.

Although he didn't need a lawyer to represent himself in the small-claims case, he claimed to be one and listed a bar number — a lawyer's license number — on court paperwork. A clerk entering the number into a computer system discovered the number wasn't Mitchell's.

"The bar number is what gave him away, and it just kind of snowballed from there," Fox said.

Meanwhile, court clerks reported seeing Mitchell in the courthouse passing out business cards that identified him as an attorney with "Berkshire King Mitchell & Sottile, PC," Fox said. Authorities couldn't find a law firm by that name. The card also lists two websites, both of which appear to be inactive.

Fox had Mitchell's picture posted with security guards at the St. Louis County Courthouse, but in a way, Mitchell turned himself in. On Feb. 29, he called the courthouse looking for a lost wallet and was told to come by to see whether it was there.

Police met Mitchell at the security checkpoint to arrest him. He was later released on bail but returned to prison to face a parole board hearing on whether to revoke probation.

In a brief telephone interview, Mitchell admitted he had represented people in court without a law license but denied taking money.

"I wanted to do my best to help," he told a reporter.

His explanations were vague.

"I have no intention of practicing law in this state, otherwise I would take the bar," he said. "Had the entire process gone through, they would have gotten off with probation. I know what I'm doing."

After his arrest, Mitchell withdrew from three of the four criminal cases, admitting in court documents that he was not licensed to practice law in Missouri. A judge removed him in the fourth case.

The two men Mitchell sought to defend could not be reached for comment.

Mitchell took advantage of the abundance of lawyers at the courthouse to blend in with the crowd, Fox said.

"We have six to seven thousand lawyers in St. Louis County, and we're seeing new ones all the time," he said.

A lawyer himself, Fox said he has never seen a situation like Mitchell's in three decades of practice.

"He was making a mess," Fox said. "Very few people have this kind of nerve."

LEGAL TANGLES

Mitchell is from Rolla, Mo., where he attended high school and found controversy early on. The Rolla School District suspended Mitchell in 1999 for comments he made in an online forum about the Columbine High School shootings. The American Civil Liberties Union represented Mitchell in a suit alleging his free speech rights were violated, and the two sides reached a settlement.

After living in Washington state for a time, he came to the St. Louis area, where he briefly ran Outlook Magazine, a publication for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender residents. The magazine folded several years ago.

Later, Mitchell took over as manager of a cabinet business in St. Louis. The company closed in 2008 amid legal troubles. The same year, an employee there accused Mitchell of opening credit card accounts listing her as the guarantor, according to police reports. When he didn't pay, banks came after her, she told police. Officers sought charges, but prosecutors declined to file them, saying there wasn't enough evidence.

In 2005, an intoxicated Mitchell knocked on the locked doors of an Alton McDonald's in the middle of the night, waving handcuffs and claiming he was a federal agent, according to police reports. He was charged with impersonating a law enforcement officer, but the case was dismissed in 2009 because Mitchell never showed up for court and police couldn't find him.

The same year, he went to prison in Missouri for about eight months after his third DWI conviction. Mitchell also has convictions for writing bad checks and stealing a credit card from a customer at a Red Robin restaurant in Des Peres, where he worked as a server.

'OUTSTANDING CLAIMS'

Mitchell is mum about his legal troubles online. On Facebook, he describes a "high-octane" lifestyle and calls himself "one of the most ambitious, outgoing and dedicated" entrepreneurs of the era.

A résumé on LinkedIn, a professional networking website, says Mitchell graduated from Washington State University and earned a law degree from Washington University in St. Louis. But officials at each university said they had no records of a Dustin Mitchell ever attending the school.

Mitchell acknowledged he was aware of the LinkedIn profile but said he did not "maintain" it.

Mitchell portrays himself as a savvy political insider. The online résumé says Dustin Mitchell worked for U.S. Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., and Mitchell told the limo driver who later sued him that he had ties to Sarah Steelman, a Republican running for U.S. senator. A spokeswoman for Foxx said Mitchell never worked there. The Steelman campaign said the candidate did once meet with Mitchell, but the campaign soon thereafter tried to distance itself from him.

"We did ask him to stop contacting the campaign so much," said Sam Steelman, a spokesman for his mother's campaign. "The guy was making some pretty outstanding claims for someone we didn't know much about at all."

Online, Dustin Mitchell claims to be running for lieutenant governor in Missouri. But he never filed for the election and said in an email after his arrest that he is no longer seeking the office.

Online, Mitchell says he is president and CEO of Assurance Inc. and describes it as a 100-plus employee company that sells identity theft protection, personal security, printing solutions and precious metals.

Websites for Assurance list an address in an office building in Clayton that houses a Bank of America branch and bank offices, a law firm and a brokerage company. Workers interviewed on different floors said they had never heard of Assurance or Mitchell, except for getting occasional mail addressed to him. Assurance is a registered company in Missouri, but records show the firm dissolved in January.

In a brief interview, Mitchell said he used to rent an office in the building, but the payments became too expensive.

Mitchell told a reporter that he could explain it all. He arranged a place and time to meet up and tell his side of the story. But he never showed up at the agreed time early this month, and didn't return calls or emails.

About a week later, he went back to prison because the theft charge against him was a violation of his parole in a DWI case.


View the original article here

Rocket Lawyer(TM) Announces UK Leadership Team

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
SAN FRANCISCO, CA--(Marketwire -03/30/12)- Rocket Lawyer?, the fastest growing online legal service, has moved forward in its plan to bring affordable legal help to the UK. As a critical first step, the company is pleased to announce the addition of Dr. Mark Edwards, as Corporate Vice President and General Manager of its UK division. Rocket Lawyer is also announcing the opening of its London office and the hiring of key staff who share the company's commitment to making the law more accessible to the British consumer online.

Rocket Lawyer provides easy and affordable legal services and has helped over 20 million people and organizations in the United States. As Rocket Lawyer expands its mission to serve the UK, Mark Edwards brings a wealth of experience and an understanding of the unique needs of British consumers.

"Many people in the UK have been underserved by traditional legal services," said Charley Moore, Founder and Executive Chairman of Rocket Lawyer. "Combine that with the current economic recovery and cuts to government legal aid, and it is even more compelling for us to offer an affordable alternative. We're thrilled to have Mark Edwards at the head of our UK service because of his experience and his shared passion for our mission."

The Rocket Lawyer UK team also includes Imran Shariff, as Head of Operations. Imran joins the team from BSkyB and brings several years of business performance management expertise.

About Mark Edwards, VP and General Manager
With a decade of experience as an innovator and business leader in the UK legal industry, Mark specializes in creating and growing new businesses based on sound market insight and customer need. He sees the team and the people in it as the crucial component for building a successful business.

Prior to joining Rocket Lawyer in 2012, Mark led the legal business development team for LexisNexis UK. There, he managed a cross-functional team, and was responsible for the full lifecycle of product innovation -- from proposition development and business case, through the launch and early sales traction. During his time at LexisNexis UK he built two new product lines.

Previously, Mark was a user experience consultant, working in various industries including telecommunications and health.

Mark has a Computing degree, a masters in User Experience, and a PhD in Artificial Intelligence.

About Rocket Lawyer?
At Rocket Lawyer, we believe everyone deserves easy and affordable legal services. Since 2008 we've helped over 20 million people and small businesses take care of their legal matters -- so they can focus on what really matters. For more information on Rocket Lawyer, please visit http://www.rocketlawyer.com and follow Rocket Lawyer on Twitter, Facebook and Google+.


View the original article here

Supreme Court rejects damage claim in HIV privacy case

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
The Supreme Court limits "actual damages" under the Privacy ActA California man sued when the government publicly revealed his HIV statusThe 5-3 ruling pitted the court's conservative majority against the liberal minorityJustice Elena Kagan, the former solicitor general, did not participate

Washington (CNN) -- A divided Supreme Court ruled Wednesday against a California pilot who sued after the federal government publicly revealed his HIV status.

In a 5-3 ruling, the high court decided Stanmore Cooper's claims of mental and emotional distress are not covered under the Privacy Act.

"The Privacy Act does not unequivocally authorize damages for mental or emotional distress and therefore does not waive the government's sovereign immunity for such harms," Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the conservative majority.

Three liberal justices dissented, while a fourth, former Solicitor General Elena Kagan, did not participate.

In a statement Wednesday, Cooper said it was "discouraging that a majority of the court sided with the government."

Cooper became a licensed recreational pilot in 1964, but two decades later, the San Francisco man was diagnosed with HIV. As his condition worsened, he let his private pilot's certificate and his airman medical certificate lapse.

In 1996, Cooper applied for long-term disability with the Social Security Administration.

"I was in bad shape, I didn't have long to live," he said last year. But his health improved thanks to a cocktail of anti-retroviral therapy. He went back to work and wanted to fly again.

"I found out they were issuing medicals (exemptions) and I reapplied" to the Federal Aviation Administration "without revealing my HIV status," he said. "Big mistake."

He received his new pilot's certificate but, unknown to him, a joint local-federal initiative called Operation Safe Pilot was launched in 2002. Using a spreadsheet, the agencies shared and compared the names and personal data of about 45,000 pilots in Northern California, looking for potentially medically unfit individuals who were also receiving federal benefits.

Cooper was among four dozen or so pilots tagged as a "person of interest." When confronted by government agents, he admitted to a misdemeanor charge of filing a false report.

He was sentenced to probation and fined, and his pilot's certificate was revoked. The retired business executive's name was listed in a federal press release and later, through his prosecution, Cooper's medical history suddenly was a matter of public record.

"I had been able to control those (with) whom I shared my information about my HIV status, limited to some co-workers, family, and close friends," he said "And suddenly that was out of my control."

Cooper, who was eventually allowed to fly again, sued.

"I chose not to reveal my HIV infection and that was a very bad thing," he said. "I took responsibility for it and I paid the price. I was punished. And I think now it's the government's turn to own up to breaking the law and take responsibility for what they did."

A federal judge found both the FAA and the Social Security Administration violated the Privacy Act with the information-sharing investigation, but said under the law, only "actual damages" could be collected by plaintiffs seeking redress.

Since Cooper made no claims for economic harm, such as lost wages or medical expenses, he was out of luck. The judge found "emotional injury" alone did not qualify and dismissed the lawsuit.

A federal appeals court reversed that decision, ruling for Cooper. The FAA then asked the high court to intervene.

During an hour of oral arguments last year, the justices stayed away from the specific claims of emotional harm made by Cooper, focusing instead on what the law says about qualifying for damages.

"The argument you have made -- and I certainly understand it, that this is the Privacy Act and so it's precisely these types of damages that you would be concerned about -- really cuts both ways," Chief Justice John Roberts said to Cooper's lawyer.

"What you are saying is this (law) covers a really big chunk of damages, because this is what the whole act was about," Roberts said. "And it seems to me that argument suggests that there is some weight to the government's point: That if you are going to get that, you really do need clearer" language in the law that would immunize the government to some extent, from a flood of hard-to-disprove lawsuits.

The ambiguity has divided lower courts for years, and privacy experts said the ease with which the government can collect and share information in the digital age makes the issue of personal privacy liability ripe for review.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg repeatedly hammered away at the government lawyer arguing for the FAA. She said the federal damages provision in question is similar to state tort claims that include both emotional and financial harm.

"The person who is subject to this, to this embarrassment, this humiliation, doesn't have out-of-pocket costs, but is terribly distressed, nervous, anxious, and all the rest," Ginsburg said. "The act that the Congress is reaching, the impact is of that nature. I mean, pecuniary (monetary) damages ordinarily attend conduct that embarrasses, humiliates you, causes mental distress."

Eric Feigin of the Justice Department said the Privacy Act's language may be interpreted as allowing damages for such things as "humiliation, embarrassment and mental anguish," but said because the phrase "actual" damages remains vague, the government should get the benefit of the doubt, tipping the case in its favor.

"Simply because a plaintiff may have suffered an adverse effect" from the privacy violation, argued Feigin, "doesn't mean that the plaintiff suffered actual damages."

Raymond Cardozo, Cooper's lawyer, pointed out during the hearing that his client's information was made public and his name and HIV status are still posted on a federal government database. He also made a larger argument, that his client's dilemma is one that may affect all Americans.

"Congress passed this act to restore the citizens' faith in their government, and it made a solemn promise to the American citizens that in cases of intentional and willful violation, the United States shall be liable for actual damages," Cardozo said. "Today, the government is proposing that "actual damages" be read in a way that renders this act virtually irrelevant. That makes a mockery of that solemn promise."

Cooper attended the public session at the court and expressed optimism afterward he would prevail.

"They've betrayed my trust and I can't get that back," Cooper said at the time. "There was nothing to lose here. I had to do it. It was the right thing to do."

The case is Cooper v. FAA (10-1024).

CNN's Tom Cohen and Kate Bolduan contribute to this report.


View the original article here

San Diego Personal Injury Attorney Announces the Launch of a New Website - PR Web (press release)

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
San Diego, CA (PRWEB) March 30, 2012

http://www.SanDiegoPersonalInjuryAttorneyz.org, based in San Diego, California announces the launch of its new website. Clients can find valuable information regarding San Diego personal injury lawyers and other services by visiting this website.

Of the thousands of people involved in automobile accidents each year, many fail to pursue further justice for their injury. A serious car accident can mean time off of work, continual health problems and mounting medical bills during a hospital stay. Insurance companies only cover a small portion of these overwhelming expenses. Anyone involved in a car accident should consult a San Diego personal injury lawyer to find out how they can get what is owed to them after an accident.

Each year thousands of people are involved in automobile accidents that lead to hospitalization, long term injury and even death. The staff at San Diego Personal Injury Attorneys are focused on providing justice for injured parties who need a San Diego personal injury lawyer. With years of experience living and representing clients in and around the San Diego, California area, the law firm knows what it takes to win a case against other drivers after an accident.

The new website, SanDiegoPersonalInjuryAttorneyz.org, has been launched to provide clients with valuable information on what to do in event of an accident. The San Diego auto accident lawyer that is chosen will hire expert witnesses to testify on your behalf during a court hearing. The goal of any lawyer is to work for the best possible outcome for their client. More information on the benefits and things clients should know about automobile accidents can be found on the new http://www.SanDiegoPersonalInjuryAttorneyz.org website.



View the original article here

Lawyer: Afghan suspect had depression after Iraq

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — The U.S. soldier accused of killing 17 Afghan civilians suffered a traumatic incident during his second tour in Iraq that triggered "tremendous depression," his lawyer said Wednesday.

Lawyer John Henry Browne said he could not discuss the details of the matter because it remains classified. But he expects the issue to become a focal point in the case against Army Staff Sgt. Robert Bales.

"It caused him tremendous depression and anxiety," Browne said.

The lawyer previously said Bales experienced other major dangers in his deployments, including a serious foot injury and head trauma. In addition, a fellow soldier's leg had been blown off days before the Afghanistan massacre, he said.

Bales was charged with 17 counts of premeditated murder and other crimes. He is being held at a U.S. military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kan.

A defense team is now in Afghanistan to collect evidence and interview other U.S. soldiers who knew Bales.

"Everyone they've spoken to in the military has nothing but amazingly positive things to say about him," said Browne, who is not part of the team in Afghanistan.

Due to security concerns, Browne doesn't think the team will visit the villages where the killings occurred. The investigators are likely to stay in Afghanistan a few more weeks.

Browne questioned the U.S. government's case against Bales, noting there is no preserved crime scene to assess.

"It's going to be a difficult case for the prosecution to prove," Browne said. "There's no 'CSI' information. There's no DNA that I know of. There's no ballistics that I know of."

Bales has indicated that he had no recollection of prescription drugs he may have been taking before the shooting — something the attorney took as an indicator of larger memory problems.

The lawyer also said his client has a sketchy memory of the night of the shootings. In a separate interview with The Washington Post, Browne said Wednesday that Bales remembered the smell of gunfire and of human bodies but not much more.

Browne added his client reported suffering from nightmares, flashbacks of war scenes and persistent headaches after his multiple combat tours. Bales told his legal team that he has long woken up with night sweats and often replays memories of a grisly scene in Iraq that he and his infantry company witnessed several years ago, Browne said.

The lawyer stressed that Bales did not confess and seemed surprised when his weapon was taken away, the newspaper reported.

U.S. military officials said Bales was drinking on a southern Afghanistan base on March 11 before creeping away to two villages at night, shooting his victims and setting many of them on fire. Nine were children.

Bales has had incidents involving alcohol and violence in the past.

In 2002, He was arrested for a drunken assault of a security guard at a Tacoma casino. That charge was dismissed after Bales completed 20 hours of anger management training.

In 2008, a couple accused an intoxicated Bales of grabbing a woman's hand and thrusting it toward his crotch before kicking and punching the woman's boyfriend, according to a police report. Prosecutors declined to pursue that case.

___

Associated Press writer Mike Baker can be reached at http://twitter.com/MikeBakerAP


View the original article here

Lawyer: Father granted humanitarian parole to enter US from Mexico to bury son ... - Washington Post

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Lawyer: Father granted humanitarian parole to enter US from Mexico to bury son killed in fire - The Washington Post Print SubscriptionConversationsToday's PaperGoing Out GuideJobsCarsReal EstateRentalsClassifiedsShoppingHomePoliticsCampaign 2012CongressCourts &LawThe Fed PageHealth CarePollingWhite HouseBlogs & ColumnsIssues: EnergyTop Blogs

Election 2012 | Felicia SonmezThe Fix | Chris CillizzaFederal Eye | Ed O’KeefeFact Checker | Glenn KesslerOpinionsAll OpinionsPostPartisanLeft-LeaningRight-LeaningTolesCartoonsTelnaesAnimationsLocalColumnist IndexLocalDC: Politics| NewsMD: Politics| CommunitiesVA: Politics| CommunitiesCrimeEducationOn Faith/LocalObituariesTraffic & CommutingWeatherBlogs & ColumnsThe Root DCTop Blogs

Post NowThe BuzzCapital Weather GangDr. GridlockSportsRedskins/NFLCapitals/NHLWizards/NBANationals/MLBDC United/SoccerCollegesAllMetSportsOther SportsBlogs & ColumnsTop Blogs

The Insider| Mike JonesCapitals Insider| Katie CarreraWizards Insider | Michael LeeNationals Journal| Adam KilgoreNationalCorrectionsEnergy & EnvironmentHealth & ScienceHigher EducationNational SecurityOn FaithOn LeadershipInnovationsOn GivingBlogs & ColumnsTop Blogs

Ideas@InnovationsPost LeadershipUnder GodCheckpoint WashingtonWorldAfricaTheAmericasAsia &PacificEuropeMiddle EastNational SecurityWar ZonesSpecial ReportsCheckpoint WashingtonBusinessEconomyIndustriesLocal BusinessMarketsPolicy&RegulationTechnologyWorldBusinessBlogs & ColumnsInnovationsOn Small BusinessTop Blogs

Wonkblog | Ezra KleinPost Tech | Cecilia KangFaster ForwardWhere We LiveInvestigationsLifestyleAdviceCarolyn HaxFoodHome & GardenStyleTravelWeddingsWellnessMagazineKidsPostTop Blogs

The Style BlogAll We Can EatReliable Source | Roxanne Roberts & Amy ArgetsingerOn Parenting | Janice D’ArcyEntertainmentBooksCelebritiesComicsGoing Out GuideHoroscopesMoviesMuseumsPuzzlesTheater & DanceTVTop Blogs

TV Column | Lisa de MoraesCelebritology | Jen ChaneyComic Riffs | Michael CavnaClassical Beat | Anne MidgetteMultimediaInnovationsPhotosVideosThe Washington PostThe Washington PostCorrectionsEnergy & EnvironmentHealth & ScienceHigher EducationNational SecurityOn FaithOn LeadershipInnovationsOn GivingBlogs & ColumnsIn the NewsMicah True Palm Sunday Romney prank ‘Game of Thrones’ 8-bit Google maps ???initialComments:true! pubdate:04/01/2012 21:38 EDT! commentPeriod:14! commentEndDate:4/15/12 9:38 EDT! currentDate:4/1/12 8:0 EDT! allowComments:true! displayComments:true!On the Mall, kites of every color

Peeps Show VI: Sweet!

The good, the bad, the salty: Food and health

Holy Week begins around the world

Lawyer: Father granted humanitarian parole to enter US from Mexico to bury son killed in fire

( Republican-Herald, David McKeown / Associated Press ) - In this Tuesday, March 27, 2012 , photo, flowers hang on the railing of 117 East Coal Street in Shenandoah, Pa., after fire consumed the home early Tuesday morning claiming four lives. A photo from 2008 displayed inside one of the flower bouquets shows fire victim Damien Lopez, top, holding his half-brother, Izayah Lopez, who was not a fire victim. Lopez’s father, Fidelmar “Fidel” Merlos-Lopez, a Mexican national, said Saturday, March 27, 2012, he has been barred from entering the United States to bury his.

( Republican-Herald, David McKeown / Associated Press ) - In this Tuesday, March 27, 2012 , photo, flowers hang on the railing of 117 East Coal Street in Shenandoah, Pa., after fire consumed the home early Tuesday morning claiming four lives. A photo from 2008 displayed inside one of the flower bouquets shows fire victim Damien Lopez, top, holding his half-brother, Izayah Lopez, who was not a fire victim. Lopez’s father, Fidelmar “Fidel” Merlos-Lopez, a Mexican national, said Saturday, March 27, 2012, he has been barred from entering the United States to bury his.( Republican-Herald, David McKeown / Associated Press ) - In this Tuesday, March 27, 2012 , photo, flowers hang on the railing of 117 East Coal Street in Shenandoah, Pa., after fire consumed the home early Tuesday morning claiming four lives. A photo from 2008 displayed inside one of the flower bouquets shows fire victim Damien Lopez, top, holding his half-brother, Izayah Lopez, who was not a fire victim. Lopez’s father, Fidelmar “Fidel” Merlos-Lopez, a Mexican national, said Saturday, March 27, 2012, he has been barred from entering the United States to bury his.CAPTIONFULLSCREEN Smaller TextLarger TextText SizePrintE-mailReprints By Associated Press, AP

ALLENTOWN, Pa. — An immigration lawyer says a Mexican man will be allowed to enter the United States to bury his 10-year-old son, a U.S. citizen who died in a house fire in northeastern Pennsylvania.

Fidelmar “Fidel” Merlos-Lopez initially was barred entry into the country. But his Philadelphia-based lawyer, Elizabeth Surin, says her client was issued a humanitarian parole to attend the funeral.

Loading...

Comments

Weigh InCorrections?

Lawyer: Man may enter US from Mexico to bury son

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
ALLENTOWN, Pa. (AP) — An immigration lawyer says a Mexican man will be allowed to enter the United States to bury his 10-year-old son, a U.S. citizen who died in a house fire in northeastern Pennsylvania.

Fidelmar "Fidel" Merlos-Lopez initially was barred entry into the country. But his Philadelphia-based lawyer, Elizabeth Surin, says her client was issued a humanitarian parole to attend the funeral.

She said early Sunday that Lopez was on a plane bound for Pennsylvania.

Lopez's son, Damien Lopez, died Tuesday in a Shenandoah row house fire along with his cousin, aunt and 7-month-old half-brother. The funeral is set for Monday.

Lopez was an illegal immigrant who left the U.S. voluntarily in 2008. He's in the process of getting his green card so he can rejoin his wife in Shenandoah.


View the original article here

Lawyer guilty of assaulting police union boss - Herald Sun

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Cookies must be enabled | Herald Sun Skip to:Main ContentSite NavigationSite FooterSite SearchSite MapNetwork Navigation (other sites)TributesShopnews.com.auFox SportsCareerOneCarsguideRealEstateNews NetworkHerald Sun NewsSuperfootySportEntertainmentOpinionBusinessLifeVideoTwitterFacebookHelpNationalThe Australiannews.com.auThe PunchFOXSPORTSSportingPulseState and TerritoryThe TelegraphCourier MailHerald SunAdelaideNowPerth NowNT NewsThe MercuryRegional and CommunityTownsville BulletinCairns.com.auGoldcoast.com.auGeelong AdvertiserWeekly Times NowCommunity NewspapersClassifiedsClassifiedsPlace my adCareerOneCarsguideRealestate.com.auTrueLocalLifestyleVogueTasteKidspotbody+soulhomelifeMarketplaceMoshtixFoxtixGetpriceShopferretOurDealWeGo TravelLearning Seat LoginSign UpUser LoginUsername *Password * Forgot your password?Subscribe now for full accessSubscribe Last Updated:April 02, 2012 Search for:

Weather: Melbourne 12°C-26°C. Mostly sunny.

Cookies must be enabled

Enabling Cookies in Internet Explorer 7, 8 & 9

Open the Internet Browser Click Tools> Internet Options>Privacy>Advanced Check Override automatic cookie handling For First-party Cookies and Third-party Cookies click Accept Click OK and OK

Enabling Cookies in Firefox

Open the Firefox browser Click Tools>Options>PrivacyEnabling Cookies in Google Chrome

Open the Google Chrome browser Click Tools icon>Options>Under the Hood>Content Settings Check Allow local data to be set Uncheck Block third-party cookies from being set Uncheck Clear cookies Close all NewsSportEntertainmentBusinessMoneyTravelOpinionVideoMobileRSS FeedsNewslettersSend StoriesSubscribeResourcesSitePhoto salesRSSAdvertisingSpecificationsPlace an AdPoliciesPrivacyTerms of UseInformationAbout UsContact UsCareersWork ExperienceTerms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyHelp Herald Sun Search for: Sign up now for your free 2 month digital pass

View the original article here

Lawyer says U.S. blocks investigation of Afghan massacre

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
SEATTLE (Reuters) - The lawyer defending the U.S. soldier accused of murdering 17 Afghan civilians claims U.S. authorities are blocking his ability to investigate the incident.

John Henry Browne, the lawyer for Staff Sergeant Robert Bales, said U.S. forces in Afghanistan have prevented his team from interviewing injured civilians at a hospital in Kandahar, and are allowing other potential witnesses to scatter, making it difficult to track them down.

"When prosecutors don't cooperate, it's because they are concerned about the strength of their case," said Browne at a press conference at his downtown Seattle office on Friday.

Bales was formally charged last week with the murders of eight adults and nine children in a pre-dawn shooting rampage in southern Afghanistan on March 11, which further eroded U.S.-Afghan relations already strained by a decade of war.

He could face the death penalty if convicted.

No date has been set for a trial, but U.S. military prosecutors are putting together their case while Browne is preparing his defense.

Browne said he has a team of investigators in Afghanistan now, but they are receiving little cooperation from military prosecutors who filed the charges.

"We are facing an almost complete information blackout from the government, which is having a devastating effect on our ability to investigate the charges preferred against our client," he said in a statement released earlier on Friday.

A reliable account of the events of the night of the massacre has not yet emerged. A recent report indicated Afghan villagers doubt Bales acted alone. Other reports suggest Bales left his base twice during the night.

"I don't believe that's the case, but we don't know for sure at this point," Browne said on Friday.

Browne said his investigators had spoken to U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan but had not managed to contact any witnesses.

DENIED ACCESS

"When we tried to interview the injured civilians being treated at Kandahar Hospital we were denied access and told to coordinate with the prosecution team," Browne said in the earlier statement.

"The next day the prosecution team interviewed the civilians injured. We found out shortly after the prosecution interviews of the injured civilians that the civilians were all released from the hospital and there was no contact information for them." That means potential witnesses will scatter and could prove unreachable, Browne said.

Prosecutors had not shared their investigative findings with his team, and would not share images captured by a surveillance camera on a blimp above the base which the Army says shows Bales returning to the camp after the alleged shooting, he said.

The next step in the case is for Bales - who is being held at a military detention center at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas - to undergo a mental assessment by Army doctors independent of both the prosecution and defense, to determine if he is fit to stand trial, known as a "sanity board" in the Army.

That could take several months, Browne said.

After that has occurred, the military justice system requires a preliminary hearing, known as an "Article 32" hearing, to establish whether there is a strong enough case to proceed to a court martial.

Browne said it was too early to say whether post-traumatic stress disorder would feature in his defense against the charges. "I don't know whether it will at all," said Browne.

"First thing we have to find out is whether the government has a case. Until we're convinced the government has a case, we're not going to start speculating on what our defenses are going to be."

(Reporting By Bill Rigby; Editing by Todd Eastham and Paul Simao)


View the original article here

Bahrain lawyer: Leading activist could face trial - Boston.com

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

MANAMA, Bahrain—A lawyer for a leading Bahrain rights activist says his client could face possible trial on charges of taking part in anti-government protests in the Gulf kingdom.

Lawyer Mohammed al-Jishi says activist Nabeel Rajab was released early Sunday after hours of interrogation. Al-Jishi says the next step may be a trial for Rajab, the president of the Bahrain Center for Human Rights.

Rajab has been an outspoken critic of crackdowns against Bahrain's Shiite majority, which began an uprising in February 2011 seeking to end the Sunni monarchy's near monopoly on power.

A police statement Saturday said Rajab was detained on charges linked to "illegal" demonstrations and the case was referred to the public prosecutor.


View the original article here