Chitika

Showing posts with label Lawyers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lawyers. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Sacramento Personal Injury Lawyers to Open Demas Law Group - PR Web (press release)

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Sacramento, California (PRWEB) March 30, 2012

A team of Sacramento injury attorneys embarks on a new course by forming the Demas Law Group. The firm began operation under this name in March of 2012. The firm's primary mission is to serve the Sacramento community in a wide array of personal injury matters. The firm is comprised of Sacramento personal injury attorneys who have decades of collective experience helping injured clients in California.

The Demas Law Group will be led by John N. Demas. Mr. Demas has successfully handled personal injury cases in the Sacramento area for twenty years, including wrongful death, catastrophic injury and defective products claims. He has represented victims of automobile, trucking, and construction accidents. Mr. Demas has earned a reputation with attorneys, clients, and insurance companies alike as a vigilant advocate for injured victims. His skill and expertise have led to some of the largest verdicts in Sacramento County history. He has been selected by his peers as a Northern California Super Lawyer for 2009, 2010, and 2011, an exclusive honor limited to less than 5% of all attorneys, and approximately 1% of plaintiff personal injury attorneys. He was recently recognized as the Trial Lawyer/Advocate of the Year by the Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association, in recognition for his extraordinary trial results and intrepid work in advocating the rights of consumers. In addition, Mr. Demas has been granted membership to The American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), and has a 10/10 rating, the highest possible rating, with the prominent attorney ranking web site, Avvo.com. He is also a member of The Justice Roundtable, an organization consisting of 100 of the nation’s top personal injury attorneys.

The Demas Law Group is committed to achieving the best possible results for its clients. Its primary objective is to serve the members of the community through open communication, compassion, and strong ethical values. The personal injury attorneys at Demas Law Group offer specialized legal skills, experience and diligence and devote all their resources to providing exceptional legal representation and personal service. Their track record of success includes numerous seven-figure settlements and verdicts, and has earned them accolades from their peers and community.

The Demas Law Group has received an "AV" rating, the highest possible national rating from Martindale-Hubbell. In addition, the firm has been given the highest marks for "adherence to professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability and diligence."



View the original article here

San Diego Personal Injury Lawyers at Morris and Associates Settle California ... - San Francisco Chronicle (press release)

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

View the original article here

Monday, April 2, 2012

Injury lawyers: compensation culture driven by insurance companies - Insurance Daily

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Russell Thomson from The Injury Lawyers explains how insurance companies are driving compensation culture for whiplash claims in a bid to chase referral fees. More from the injury lawyers injury claims website: The?Injury Lawyers.

Whiplash claims, whiplash compensation, whiplash injuries – or Whiplash Cash, Whiplash Epidemic, and “the weakest necks in Britain” as the press often title it; whiplash has not escaped the news over the last decade as compensation claims continue to rise together with our car insurance premiums as well.

It’s obvious to anyone that it’s all getting way out of hand!

But what’s the reality behind all this? What can we do to solve the problem? We often hear in the news from the insurance companies complaining about higher volumes of claims causing premiums to rise. We absolutely love a good scandal here in the UK – making one out of whiplash is just way too easy to do.

So, why are the government wanting to crack down so hard on whiplash? Are we facing a real compensation culture? And what should be done about whiplash claims to solve the problem?

Let’s Face Facts – It’s a Hard Knock Economy…

As an economist by education, it’s easy for me to try and look at the bigger picture in these tight financial times. Let’s face it – we can’t afford to be paying out huge premiums for insurance. It makes anyone angry to think their premiums are going up and up; it makes me personally angry knowing I have to pay more and more! The insurers have been quick to answer our concerns – “the surge in whiplash claims is increasing everyone’s premiums!!!” All of our purse strings are as tight as we can pull them at the moment.

Naturally, the government want to do something about it. To be able to say to the people “we will take this whiplash problem seriously and do something about it to save all your premiums being too high” is a powerful political tool. We, the British people, like I said earlier, love a good a scandal; and generally like to have a good dig out our government whilst we’re at it! When they turn round and tell us they can save us some cash by solving what seems to be a huge problem in our society today, we’re quick to lap it up and prepare our ballot choices for the next election.

We call it “the compensation culture”. It’s a great catch phrase, isn’t it? But to really understand a problem, we have to delve a little deeper and try to understand what the underlying issues really are…

The Compensation Culture Explained

If you have read the government reports surrounding the Compensation Culture, namely the Lord Young and Lord Jackson reports, then you may well know what I’m going to say next. Amazingly, there is no such thing as a compensation culture! It’s actually a media fuelled myth that was formed in the wake of the whole whiplash problem I’m writing about now, together with the whole “where there’s a blame, there’s a claim” idea! Claims are on the rise, and insurance premiums are on the rise too – that natural assumption it’s because people are claiming left right and centre is the obvious conclusion we draw.

What we should be doing is looking deeper in to the underlying issues; the real problem. The first point of call is to ask one simple question – how has this all happened? How did we get ourselves in to this predicament? Answer this one easy question, and the answer is pretty simple to see.

Why are there more people claiming? Well, it’s safe to say that more people are aware that they have the right to make a claim for compensation, and will therefore use the human right they have to claim from a policy of insurance that covers injuries to third party victims. Which is a quick point in itself – insurance is there to cover people for damages, so why shouldn’t we claim from it??

There is certainly far more advertising for whiplash claims than there used to be. Aside from the adverts on the TV and the radio, type “Whiplash” in to Google or any other search engine and see the flood of results from companies offering you their services for a compensation claim.

But there is something far more sinister at work when it comes to whiplash claims. There is something out there that is the real reason why people are making more claims, including a minority making fraudulent ones. Its two simple words that are so powerful they have the ability, when utilised in the right way, to make millions and millions for companies that involve themselves in the practice. These two simple yet powerful words are “Referral Fees”?

Referral Fees – The Real Problem

The real reason why there are so many people being pushed in to making compensation claims is because of the practice of personal injury referral fees. Whiplash claims in many instances are relatively easy to win – a rear end collision accident is basically money just waiting to be earned by the solicitor who will take it on. This salient fact has been picked up on and turned in to one of the biggest money making schemes in the last century.?

If you hold the details of a whiplash accident victim, you are potentially holding £1,500.00 of legal fees in your hands. £1,500.00 is a fair bit of money. You approach anyone in the street and say to them “would you like £1,500.00?” and you’ll find the majority of people would be more than happy to oblige.

You tell a law firm that you can give them £1,500.00 for nothing and you would have one happy law firm. You tell them you can give them £1,500.00 in exchange for £800.00 and you still have a happy law firm. Can you see where I’m going with this?

The personal details of an accident victim who was not at fault in an incident is worth potentially a lot of money. Insurance companies, garages, breakdown and recovery firms, and the scrupulous claim and accident management companies have all clocked on to this; and they’re all making millions of pounds from it.

The most common one is Legal Expenses Insurance, or Motor Legal Protection as it’s sometimes called. The vast majority of people with a motor insurance policy will probably have this as an added extra, or will be physically paying for it as an addition to their insurance policy. Your insurance company will tell you that this vital addition to your policy means you have the benefit of legal insurance for a claim for compensation should you ever be in an accident.

Now, don’t get me wrong, it is a form of insurance; but when your insurers pass your details over to one of their panel of approved lawyers under the insurance scheme, they receive a healthy referral fee or administration fee for their troubles. Amazingly, this can be in the region of £800.00 to £1,000.00.

So, to break it down in extremely simple terms, if you have an accident and your insurers pass you over to a personal injury lawyer, your insurers could receive up to £1,000.00 for doing so. They are essentially “selling” your claim over to a law firm. Given that one of the first points of contact you make after an accident is to your own insurers, they can get the deal done there and then without delay; leaving the accident victim without the opportunity to even think about whether they are going to make or claim, nor who they might instruct to deal with a case.

If your insurers don’t catch it in time, the recovery firm you use may well also refer your details over to a law firm for a handsome payout instead – or the garage you take your car to, or even the police according to some sources in the past. Ultimately, anyone who knows about your accident can simply refer your details over to a claims company or a law firm and they can swoop your claim within hours or days.

I bought a new car and received a free “Accident Assistance” pack which basically told me to call this one helpline number if I am ever in an accident. Why? Because they will know right away if I have a claim and will be able to refer the case over to a lawyer for cold hard cash! You really can’t escape this nowadays; and you probably don’t even know it.

Now, let’s say for arguments sake this practice doesn’t exist. If it didn’t, the amount of people who would not even consider making a claim would be huge. Many wouldn’t even think about it at all! So it’s safe to say that the increase in claims is actually down to the fact that insurers and anyone else involved in the road accident process are pushing people in to claims when they may well have never even considered making a claim until they are contacted by someone telling them they could claim thousands of pounds in compensation.

Hey – we’re in a recession! Who the hell wouldn’t accept the opportunity to get thousands of pounds for a compensation claim!?

Insurers Referral Fees Exposed – The Insurers “Dirty Little Secret”

As it so happens, this was all exposed in the media last year, which for independent law firms like us who do not, and never have, paid for claims by way of referral fees, is great news! The simple fact is that not all law firms buy claims from insurers and claims companies as we don’t believe in the practice whatsoever. All our clients come to us directly for our reputation after seeking advice about whether they can make a claim for the whiplash they are suffering.

Last year former Justice Secretary Mr Jack Straw brought to light and blasted what he has termed as the “huge racket” of insurers passing on details to personal injury lawyers for extortionate fees. The reports confirm that Mr Straw has said that “the practice had driven a surge in no-win, no-fee claims this year which put up premiums – all with the insurers’ knowledge”.

So, as you can see, it’s the insurers themselves that are akin to this apparent problem.

My own insurers tried to sell me Legal Expenses Insurance as part of my policy at least four times when I switched over to them. The lady simply persisted and persisted, putting me on hold several times whilst she, I assume, was telling her supervisor she was having difficulty selling it to me. In the end I told her outright “it’s my job to stop it; I work for an independent personal injury law firm and know all about the referral fee scams!” Her response in all honesty was classic – “oh… erm, never mind then…”

They did try again when I renewed. I got a call from a pleasant sounding young man asking if Id received my new policy documents through the post, before he quickly said “oh I’ve just noticed you don’t have legal protection on your policy, which is quite a problem for people if you have an accident”. It was 9:30am in the morning and I didn’t have the patience when I told him “the real problem is insurers selling peoples details to law firms for cash; I work for a law firm, so I think I’ll do without it thanks.”

It seems we are facing situations were insurers are so desperate to sell details to lawyers for claims, we are facing potentially fraudulent claims from pushy insurance companies. Whilst whiplash is a real and difficult injury to live with (I know, I’ve still got mine!), people are being pushed in to wrongfully cashing in on it.

Investigations from Mr Straw brought him to the Association of British Insurers, and two of the UK’s largest insurance companies, whom admitted to selling on their own customers personal details to solicitors for profit.

“I went to see the Association of British Insurers (ABI), and senior executives of two of Britain’s largest motor insurers,” Straw wrote in The Times.

“I asked them. A long pause, a look of embarrassment, then one of these executives said: ‘This is the industry’s dirty secret. It’s we, the insurance companies, who sell on this personal information.’?

“It is gobsmacking,” Straw said. “The insurers are complicit in something that is against their interests. In my view, what they are doing, in principle, is contrary to the spirit of data protection.”

The above, I believe, pretty much says it all.

Referral Fees to be Banned – Problem Solved?

Both the Law Society and the Bar Council have recommended in the past that referral fees be stopped on the grounds that they have the potential to limit access to justice and reduce the quality of legal services on offer.

Following news of the pending ban, Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly has also spoken out and confirmed “It’s certainly a racket. It’s a sick culture that we have to turn round.” The bill has been passed through government, and it is now just a matter of time before they are banned outright. This could help to solve the problem by reducing the amount of claims as people will not be pushed in to making a claim by insurers and companies looking to make a quick buck from selling their claim to a law firm.

Chairman of the Bar, Peter Lodder QC, has also spoken out, saying that referral fees have “no place in a fair and open justice system… They are bribes and add an unnecessary cost to litigation.”

Are you saying that the insurers are actually to blame for the surge in increased claims and premium rises then?

Yes. I am. I told you that whiplash claims and the rising compensation culture would be fully exposed. But what has been exposed is probably not quite what you expected to hear. Just look at the facts we have before us, and you tell me who is really to blame for all of this…

Category: Insurance Blog, Insurance News, Legal News


View the original article here

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Two Firm Injury Lawyers Recognized as Top 40 Under 40 Trial Lawyers in Virginia - PR Web (press release)

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Virginia Beach, VA (PRWEB) March 30, 2012

The National Trial Lawyers has selected Virginia injury attorneys Emily Mapp Brannon and Kevin Duffan, associates with the Shapiro, Lewis & Appleton law firm, for inclusion in “Top 40 under 40″ trial lawyers in Virginia.

The National Trial Lawyers Top 40 Under 40 is a professional organization comprised of America’s top young trial attorneys. Membership into the Top 40 Under 40 association is by invitation only and is limited to lawyers under the age of 40 who are chosen by a comprehensive selection process that includes peer nominations and third-party research. Those lawyers selected have excelled in the court room, possess superior qualifications, and have displayed leadership as young trial lawyers.

Basically, this means Emily and Kevin are some of the best personal injury lawyers in Virginia under the age of 40.

Our Virginia personal injury law firm is proud that Emily and Kevin were selected for this prestigious honor. They represent our firm’s commitment to excellence and willingness to advocate our client’s rights from the initial pleading all the way to a jury trial, when necessary.

Emily and Kevin’s achievement comes on the heels of the firm being selected as one of the best injury law firms in Virginia for 2011-2012 by U.S. News & World Report.



View the original article here

Sacramento Personal Injury Lawyers to Open Demas Law Group - PR Web (press release)

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Sacramento, California (PRWEB) March 30, 2012

A team of Sacramento injury attorneys embarks on a new course by forming the Demas Law Group. The firm began operation under this name in March of 2012. The firm's primary mission is to serve the Sacramento community in a wide array of personal injury matters. The firm is comprised of Sacramento personal injury attorneys who have decades of collective experience helping injured clients in California.

The Demas Law Group will be led by John N. Demas. Mr. Demas has successfully handled personal injury cases in the Sacramento area for twenty years, including wrongful death, catastrophic injury and defective products claims. He has represented victims of automobile, trucking, and construction accidents. Mr. Demas has earned a reputation with attorneys, clients, and insurance companies alike as a vigilant advocate for injured victims. His skill and expertise have led to some of the largest verdicts in Sacramento County history. He has been selected by his peers as a Northern California Super Lawyer for 2009, 2010, and 2011, an exclusive honor limited to less than 5% of all attorneys, and approximately 1% of plaintiff personal injury attorneys. He was recently recognized as the Trial Lawyer/Advocate of the Year by the Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association, in recognition for his extraordinary trial results and intrepid work in advocating the rights of consumers. In addition, Mr. Demas has been granted membership to The American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), and has a 10/10 rating, the highest possible rating, with the prominent attorney ranking web site, Avvo.com. He is also a member of The Justice Roundtable, an organization consisting of 100 of the nation’s top personal injury attorneys.

The Demas Law Group is committed to achieving the best possible results for its clients. Its primary objective is to serve the members of the community through open communication, compassion, and strong ethical values. The personal injury attorneys at Demas Law Group offer specialized legal skills, experience and diligence and devote all their resources to providing exceptional legal representation and personal service. Their track record of success includes numerous seven-figure settlements and verdicts, and has earned them accolades from their peers and community.

The Demas Law Group has received an "AV" rating, the highest possible national rating from Martindale-Hubbell. In addition, the firm has been given the highest marks for "adherence to professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability and diligence."



View the original article here

Personal injury lawyers Schwartzapfel partners, sponsor of the work Conference-Albany Times Union

1. the annual amount of the building and construction trades Council of greater New York provides safety in the workplace of the light

Hollywood, FL (PRWEB) 19. March 2012

More than 100 Labor leaders and their presence in the construction of the Building and were available on the back of the Council of greater New York and, in the case of personal injury lawyers, Schwartzapfel partners was a proud sponsor of this event. It was the first such annual event of its kind, the uraauurtavia of the work of the Forum of the leaders of the greater New York area.

"It is the hope that by providing a platform for many of the advances shall be made in the workers ' rights," said Steven Schwartzapfel, Schwartzapfel partners P.C. "it is important to support the trade unions and Union leaders, because they help to protect workers against unfair practices on the part of the employer, and then make sure that the safety of their members, in particular the employer's profits before."

The Conference was held at The Westin Diplomat Resort, Hollywood, FL. many registrants are the Conference of the parties, organizations, policy makers, and some even hold the dual roles of the Union and of the Taft-Hartley to the benefit of the Fund Trustees. Proud sponsor of the event was Schwartzapfel Partners P.C. and the size of the Conference, the presence of.

"We are proud to sponsor the Conference, which deals with the important issue of the occupational safety and health," Schwartzapfel is added. "Everyone has the right to feel safe in their work. It is when the risk of personal injury lawyers, such as yourself, is the phase of the working Man to stand. "

Information about the partners P.C. Schwartzapfel
Schwartzapfel Partners P.C. is visible and following the plaintiff personal injury and business litigation in New York. An investment firm shall be dealt with in the tens of thousands of cases and helped thousands get the money and they deserve the benefits to customers. To the extent that the company is in a difficult situation is easier and the company's lawyers are proud of the success rate of more than 98%. Schwartzapfel Partners P.C. fights for those who cannot protect themselves, in order to protect the rights of.

In the case of personal injury lawyers at the partners to focus on all types of personal injury Schwartzapfel litigation matters, including insurance cover (bus, car, truck, motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian), medical malpractice, wrongful death, defective products and drugs, construction accidents, occupational accidents, workers compensation, social security disability, nursing home neglect and abuse, and in cases of complex highway design. Contact law firm, call the 800 966-4999, or through the contact form on your company's network.

The version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/prweb2012/3/prweb9303175.htm


View the original article here

Saturday, March 31, 2012

The two companies the injury lawyers recognized as Top 40 lawyers under 40 in the trial version of Virginia-PR Web (press release)

Virginia Beach, VA (PRWEB) 30. March 2012

National trial lawyers has selected Virginia injury Bützow – Emily Mapp Brannon and Kevin Duffan, associates with Shapiro, Lewis and Appleton law firm, to be included in the "Virginia 40 ' for the trial lawyers in 40 of the world.

National trial lawyers Top 40 in the u.s. top 40 young people in the trial version of Bützow consists of a professional organization. Membership of the Top 40 in the 40-40-year-olds only, and upon the invitation of lawyers, which have opted for a process, which includes peer candidates and third-party research is limited. These lawyers have excelled in the room of the Court of Justice selected, superior competence and must be displayed in the leadership of the young people in the trial lawyers.

This means, in practice, Emily and Kevin are some of the 40-year-olds, the Virginia personal injury lawyers.

Our Virginia personal injury law firm is proud that Emily and Kevin was elected to this prestigious honor. They represent our company's commitment to excellence and the willingness on the part of the opinion of Advocate General of our client's rights to the original statement, though, when it is necessary.

Emily and Kevin's achievement is one of the best damage-Virginia is selected in the right companies in 2011 and 2012, US News and World Report, according to the company.



View the original article here

Friday, March 30, 2012

Sacramento personal injury lawyers open law group, Demas-PR Web (press release)

Sacramento, California (PRWEB) 30. March 2012

Sacramento injury Bützow group if the group to start a new course of Demas. The company began operations under the name in 2012, this March. The company's primary function is to serve the Sacramento community a wide range of personal injury matters. The company is made up of a Sacramento personal injury lawyer, with a common experience of injured to help customers in California for decades.

Demas-the group led by John n. Demas. Mr. Demas has been successfully dealt with in the case of personal injury case, the Sacramento, California area in 20 years, including the undue death, catastrophic injury and defective products claims. He is represented by the auto, trucking and construction accidents. Mr. Demas has earned the reputation of a lawyer, customers and insurance companies, which are similar to the vigilance with regard to the opinion of the Advocate General at the injured victims. Some of the Sacramento County is the largest in the history of the court procedures have led to his skills and knowledge. He was selected by his peers as the "Northern California Super Lawyers 2009, 2010 and 2011, the exclusive honor, only less than 5% of all lawyers and approximately 1% of the plaintiff personal injury to Bützow. He recognized recently as the trial lawyer of the year Capitol City trial version/the Advocate General lawyers ' Association, the extraordinary results of the studies and the work of consumers ' rights, recognition of the intrepid is activated. In addition, Mr. Demas has been granted membership of the American Board of trial advocates (ABOTA), and is a 10/10 rating, the highest possible rating of prominent attorney rating web site Avvo.com. He is also right in the Organization of the nation's senior Roundtable, in the case of personal injury Bützow 100 member.

Demas Law Group is committed to its customers with the best possible results. The main aim is to serve the needs of an open communication, not compassion and strong ethical values, through the members of the community. Personal injury lawyer law group, Demas, the legal specialized, experience and diligence, and the security log for all of the resources of the exceptional legal assistance and personal service. The success of the fishing activities of their entries in includes a number of seven figure settlement and court procedures, and has earned the United States a peer-to-peer and community.

Demas, a group of law has received the "AV" rating, the highest possible rating in Martindale-Hubbell national. In addition, the company has been given the highest marks "to meet the professional standards of conduct, ethics, reliability and care."



View the original article here

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Injury lawyers: compensation culture driven by insurance companies - Insurance Daily

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Russell Thomson from The Injury Lawyers explains how insurance companies are driving compensation culture for whiplash claims in a bid to chase referral fees. More from the injury lawyers injury claims website: The?Injury Lawyers.

Whiplash claims, whiplash compensation, whiplash injuries – or Whiplash Cash, Whiplash Epidemic, and “the weakest necks in Britain” as the press often title it; whiplash has not escaped the news over the last decade as compensation claims continue to rise together with our car insurance premiums as well.

It’s obvious to anyone that it’s all getting way out of hand!

But what’s the reality behind all this? What can we do to solve the problem? We often hear in the news from the insurance companies complaining about higher volumes of claims causing premiums to rise. We absolutely love a good scandal here in the UK – making one out of whiplash is just way too easy to do.

So, why are the government wanting to crack down so hard on whiplash? Are we facing a real compensation culture? And what should be done about whiplash claims to solve the problem?

Let’s Face Facts – It’s a Hard Knock Economy…

As an economist by education, it’s easy for me to try and look at the bigger picture in these tight financial times. Let’s face it – we can’t afford to be paying out huge premiums for insurance. It makes anyone angry to think their premiums are going up and up; it makes me personally angry knowing I have to pay more and more! The insurers have been quick to answer our concerns – “the surge in whiplash claims is increasing everyone’s premiums!!!” All of our purse strings are as tight as we can pull them at the moment.

Naturally, the government want to do something about it. To be able to say to the people “we will take this whiplash problem seriously and do something about it to save all your premiums being too high” is a powerful political tool. We, the British people, like I said earlier, love a good a scandal; and generally like to have a good dig out our government whilst we’re at it! When they turn round and tell us they can save us some cash by solving what seems to be a huge problem in our society today, we’re quick to lap it up and prepare our ballot choices for the next election.

We call it “the compensation culture”. It’s a great catch phrase, isn’t it? But to really understand a problem, we have to delve a little deeper and try to understand what the underlying issues really are…

The Compensation Culture Explained

If you have read the government reports surrounding the Compensation Culture, namely the Lord Young and Lord Jackson reports, then you may well know what I’m going to say next. Amazingly, there is no such thing as a compensation culture! It’s actually a media fuelled myth that was formed in the wake of the whole whiplash problem I’m writing about now, together with the whole “where there’s a blame, there’s a claim” idea! Claims are on the rise, and insurance premiums are on the rise too – that natural assumption it’s because people are claiming left right and centre is the obvious conclusion we draw.

What we should be doing is looking deeper in to the underlying issues; the real problem. The first point of call is to ask one simple question – how has this all happened? How did we get ourselves in to this predicament? Answer this one easy question, and the answer is pretty simple to see.

Why are there more people claiming? Well, it’s safe to say that more people are aware that they have the right to make a claim for compensation, and will therefore use the human right they have to claim from a policy of insurance that covers injuries to third party victims. Which is a quick point in itself – insurance is there to cover people for damages, so why shouldn’t we claim from it??

There is certainly far more advertising for whiplash claims than there used to be. Aside from the adverts on the TV and the radio, type “Whiplash” in to Google or any other search engine and see the flood of results from companies offering you their services for a compensation claim.

But there is something far more sinister at work when it comes to whiplash claims. There is something out there that is the real reason why people are making more claims, including a minority making fraudulent ones. Its two simple words that are so powerful they have the ability, when utilised in the right way, to make millions and millions for companies that involve themselves in the practice. These two simple yet powerful words are “Referral Fees”?

Referral Fees – The Real Problem

The real reason why there are so many people being pushed in to making compensation claims is because of the practice of personal injury referral fees. Whiplash claims in many instances are relatively easy to win – a rear end collision accident is basically money just waiting to be earned by the solicitor who will take it on. This salient fact has been picked up on and turned in to one of the biggest money making schemes in the last century.?

If you hold the details of a whiplash accident victim, you are potentially holding £1,500.00 of legal fees in your hands. £1,500.00 is a fair bit of money. You approach anyone in the street and say to them “would you like £1,500.00?” and you’ll find the majority of people would be more than happy to oblige.

You tell a law firm that you can give them £1,500.00 for nothing and you would have one happy law firm. You tell them you can give them £1,500.00 in exchange for £800.00 and you still have a happy law firm. Can you see where I’m going with this?

The personal details of an accident victim who was not at fault in an incident is worth potentially a lot of money. Insurance companies, garages, breakdown and recovery firms, and the scrupulous claim and accident management companies have all clocked on to this; and they’re all making millions of pounds from it.

The most common one is Legal Expenses Insurance, or Motor Legal Protection as it’s sometimes called. The vast majority of people with a motor insurance policy will probably have this as an added extra, or will be physically paying for it as an addition to their insurance policy. Your insurance company will tell you that this vital addition to your policy means you have the benefit of legal insurance for a claim for compensation should you ever be in an accident.

Now, don’t get me wrong, it is a form of insurance; but when your insurers pass your details over to one of their panel of approved lawyers under the insurance scheme, they receive a healthy referral fee or administration fee for their troubles. Amazingly, this can be in the region of £800.00 to £1,000.00.

So, to break it down in extremely simple terms, if you have an accident and your insurers pass you over to a personal injury lawyer, your insurers could receive up to £1,000.00 for doing so. They are essentially “selling” your claim over to a law firm. Given that one of the first points of contact you make after an accident is to your own insurers, they can get the deal done there and then without delay; leaving the accident victim without the opportunity to even think about whether they are going to make or claim, nor who they might instruct to deal with a case.

If your insurers don’t catch it in time, the recovery firm you use may well also refer your details over to a law firm for a handsome payout instead – or the garage you take your car to, or even the police according to some sources in the past. Ultimately, anyone who knows about your accident can simply refer your details over to a claims company or a law firm and they can swoop your claim within hours or days.

I bought a new car and received a free “Accident Assistance” pack which basically told me to call this one helpline number if I am ever in an accident. Why? Because they will know right away if I have a claim and will be able to refer the case over to a lawyer for cold hard cash! You really can’t escape this nowadays; and you probably don’t even know it.

Now, let’s say for arguments sake this practice doesn’t exist. If it didn’t, the amount of people who would not even consider making a claim would be huge. Many wouldn’t even think about it at all! So it’s safe to say that the increase in claims is actually down to the fact that insurers and anyone else involved in the road accident process are pushing people in to claims when they may well have never even considered making a claim until they are contacted by someone telling them they could claim thousands of pounds in compensation.

Hey – we’re in a recession! Who the hell wouldn’t accept the opportunity to get thousands of pounds for a compensation claim!?

Insurers Referral Fees Exposed – The Insurers “Dirty Little Secret”

As it so happens, this was all exposed in the media last year, which for independent law firms like us who do not, and never have, paid for claims by way of referral fees, is great news! The simple fact is that not all law firms buy claims from insurers and claims companies as we don’t believe in the practice whatsoever. All our clients come to us directly for our reputation after seeking advice about whether they can make a claim for the whiplash they are suffering.

Last year former Justice Secretary Mr Jack Straw brought to light and blasted what he has termed as the “huge racket” of insurers passing on details to personal injury lawyers for extortionate fees. The reports confirm that Mr Straw has said that “the practice had driven a surge in no-win, no-fee claims this year which put up premiums – all with the insurers’ knowledge”.

So, as you can see, it’s the insurers themselves that are akin to this apparent problem.

My own insurers tried to sell me Legal Expenses Insurance as part of my policy at least four times when I switched over to them. The lady simply persisted and persisted, putting me on hold several times whilst she, I assume, was telling her supervisor she was having difficulty selling it to me. In the end I told her outright “it’s my job to stop it; I work for an independent personal injury law firm and know all about the referral fee scams!” Her response in all honesty was classic – “oh… erm, never mind then…”

They did try again when I renewed. I got a call from a pleasant sounding young man asking if Id received my new policy documents through the post, before he quickly said “oh I’ve just noticed you don’t have legal protection on your policy, which is quite a problem for people if you have an accident”. It was 9:30am in the morning and I didn’t have the patience when I told him “the real problem is insurers selling peoples details to law firms for cash; I work for a law firm, so I think I’ll do without it thanks.”

It seems we are facing situations were insurers are so desperate to sell details to lawyers for claims, we are facing potentially fraudulent claims from pushy insurance companies. Whilst whiplash is a real and difficult injury to live with (I know, I’ve still got mine!), people are being pushed in to wrongfully cashing in on it.

Investigations from Mr Straw brought him to the Association of British Insurers, and two of the UK’s largest insurance companies, whom admitted to selling on their own customers personal details to solicitors for profit.

“I went to see the Association of British Insurers (ABI), and senior executives of two of Britain’s largest motor insurers,” Straw wrote in The Times.

“I asked them. A long pause, a look of embarrassment, then one of these executives said: ‘This is the industry’s dirty secret. It’s we, the insurance companies, who sell on this personal information.’?

“It is gobsmacking,” Straw said. “The insurers are complicit in something that is against their interests. In my view, what they are doing, in principle, is contrary to the spirit of data protection.”

The above, I believe, pretty much says it all.

Referral Fees to be Banned – Problem Solved?

Both the Law Society and the Bar Council have recommended in the past that referral fees be stopped on the grounds that they have the potential to limit access to justice and reduce the quality of legal services on offer.

Following news of the pending ban, Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly has also spoken out and confirmed “It’s certainly a racket. It’s a sick culture that we have to turn round.” The bill has been passed through government, and it is now just a matter of time before they are banned outright. This could help to solve the problem by reducing the amount of claims as people will not be pushed in to making a claim by insurers and companies looking to make a quick buck from selling their claim to a law firm.

Chairman of the Bar, Peter Lodder QC, has also spoken out, saying that referral fees have “no place in a fair and open justice system… They are bribes and add an unnecessary cost to litigation.”

Are you saying that the insurers are actually to blame for the surge in increased claims and premium rises then?

Yes. I am. I told you that whiplash claims and the rising compensation culture would be fully exposed. But what has been exposed is probably not quite what you expected to hear. Just look at the facts we have before us, and you tell me who is really to blame for all of this…

Category: Insurance Blog, Insurance News, Legal News


View the original article here

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Injury lawyers: explaining whiplash claims - Banking Times

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Russell Thomson is an injury claims lawyer working at The Injury Lawyers, who explains that while whiplash is a clear and serious issue, the whole subject has become badly distorted through insurance companies selling customer details for referral fees.

Like Tony Blair and his “Education, Education, Education” speech at the start of Labours last bout of parliamentary power, the topic we’re looking at here is “Whiplash, Whiplash, Whiplash” – it’s all about whiplash!

You have heard all about it in the news, and you may well have experienced it yourself, or know someone who has made a whiplash claim. The fact that remains in today’s society is the real negative viewpoint people have of this injury. So I decided, as a representative of a firm of lawyers that deal with whiplash, and a whiplash sufferer myself, to give you some enlightenment from the other side of the coin; because all you will hear about in the press is everyone slating the validity of whiplash as an injury.

Is whiplash even a real injury?

Well, yes, of course it is. If you grab an elastic band and stretch it, it returns back to normal so long as you haven’t pulled it too far. Which is kind of my point; stretch it too far and you will either shred it or snap it. Pull anything too much and it will eventually ‘give’ and break or stretch too much and cause damage.

There are apparently over 50 muscles in the back structure alone. Now, imagine 50 muscles being stretched beyond their normal range of movement, and hey-ho, you have whiplash! It’s not always just a little bit of an ache that goes away over a few days; it can sometimes be a severely debilitating injury that is caused by the muscles in the neck, back, and shoulders being pulled beyond their normal range of movement.

Upon an impact or a sudden stop, you are thrown forwards and backwards within the restraint of your seatbelt, assuming you are wearing one. This lurch forward is what stretches the many ligaments and tendons in the neck, shoulders and back structure beyond their normal range of movement, resulting in obvious damage to them. You can pull a muscle in your leg from playing football – a similar principle applies. So yes, whiplash is a real injury.

But we hear too often in the news about it being difficult to diagnose. I’m not sure why really, because whiplash is diagnosable – there are physical symptoms that can be felt. A person with whiplash may have stiff areas in the neck, shoulders and back which are definable to the human touch. The stiffness is caused by the damage which was caused by the overstretching of the muscles. Yes, there are occasions where it may be more difficult to see; but with a little common sense and deductive logic, apply the earlier principle of muscles being overstretched in an impact or a sudden stop and its quite clear to understand you can end up with a whiplash injury.

When it comes to making a claim, the injury must be medically assessed to prove its validity. An assessment with a qualified medical expert who has access to the Claimants medical records is a common part of the claims process. A report is completed and the expert will give their opinion as to the severity of the injury and the affects it has had on the Claimants life. The expert is entirely independent – their duty is to the court, NOT to the Claimant; so there is no bias. They get paid for their work either way, and they must give their professionally qualified opinion. They will only agree with what is reasonable in the report.

Surrounding the “whiplash epidemic” or “whiplash problem” as its often termed is the government’s movement to ban personal injury referral fees that are thought to be at the centre of a surge in whiplash claims over the last decade. However, there appears to be a cultural trend that has crossed over in to the campaign to rid the UK of the referral fee system which focuses on whiplash itself being the problem; which it isn’t.

Yes, whiplash claims can be sometimes difficult to prove; however, former Justice Secretary Mr Jack Straw has lost a great deal of respect for the following quotation from a speech regarding the bill in the House of Commons last year:

“Often such claims are for whiplash, which is not so much an injury, more a profitable invention of the human imagination—undiagnosable except by third-rate doctors in the pay of the claims management companies or personal injury lawyers”

This is what I will professionally term as a “seriously stupid statement”. The above is not true. As I said earlier, whiplash IS diagnosable, and it CAN be felt to the human touch. The experts that are instructed are not “in the pay of the claims management companies or personal injury lawyers”; in fact, their fees are recovered from the insurers, and the expert, who must be independent, must be agreed with the insurers before instruction. The insurers have the right to object to any proposed experts, and can even get their own medical evidence for claims!

Quickly turning to my own experience of whiplash, which I am still suffering from since last May (although one reason may be an unrelated leg injury I have from this January that may have exacerbated the whiplash through the use of crutches for months), I was seen by a Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon with all the qualifications to boot.

I therefore ask the right honourable gentleman speaker Mr Jack Straw if he is seriously suggesting that the Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon I saw for my medical report whom confirmed my whiplash is nothing more than a “third-rate doctor”!??

Furthermore, was the qualified physiotherapist I received treatment from also some useless “third-rate” practitioner whom just wasted her time poking and prodding my back for no good reason?? Were these two medical professionals both lying when they could feel the damage in my back muscles which I still get trouble with today, and never had issues with prior to the accident? Am I, Mr Straw, also lying through my back teeth because I want a quick cash payout for an invented injury?

Are you calling us all liars, and claiming that the firm I work for is fraudulently suing the bus company responsible for my injuries??

The real issue is simple – due to the referral fee system that insurance companies push people in to making claims through, we see a higher proportion of fraudulent or frivolous claims. There could easily be a small minority who could try and “milk the system” but that doesn’t mean all whiplash sufferers are doing the same. There are, and have been in the past, unbelievable amounts of people cheating the benefits system, for one example. The simple fact is that these are not symptoms of a “whiplash problem” but rather more they are the common symptoms associated with anything that involves financial gain in today’s society. You simply cannot escape fraud!

So what about the lawyers claiming high fees for whiplash claims? Well as a matter of fact we lawyers are capped to restricted legal fees, so that’s not really an issue. The fact does remain however that a lawyer is needed to protect the rights of the Claimant from being fobbed off by the insurers.

Third Party Capture is a term used to describe the insurers of the party at fault contacting the victim to settle the claim directly. The amount of times we get calls from people who have been suffering for two months and the insurers are sticking to their offer of £500.00 is unreal. The insurers know full well that a two month whiplash injury is worth more than £500.00, yet they see the opportunity to save themselves some money by purposefully trying to under settle a claim. Where is the justice in that?

In the past, insurers would pay independent companies and agents to settle claims directly with the innocent victims. The cheaper the claim was settled for, the more commission these agents would receive. It’s no secret that insurers have, and will continue to try and save money at the expense of the victims to which they are legally responsible for paying out. Think of it like this – you get your vehicle assessed for valuation of repairs before you settle the claim with the insurers; why wouldn’t you do the same for your injury? This simply requires a lawyer.

So how do we solve the problem?

Well, realistically, there isn’t a problem per-se. There are no more problems than there already are in other situations in life were people can “milk the system”. All this talk of cutting whiplash claims and making it harder to make a claim will only serve to be an injustice for the majority genuine whiplash victims who have suffered at the hands of a negligent driver. We have car insurance for the sole purposes of making a claim from – it’s there to be used! Perhaps what we should be focusing on is making sure there are less dangerous drivers on the road, and improving safety in vehicles to prevent or reduce the damage a whiplash injury can cause. Research is already underway in to ways that vehicles can prevent a whiplash injury, or reduce the affects.

We can of course continue to improve efficiency in the way claims are dealt with, but the new system we have had since 2010 whereby legal fees are further reduced and claims are dealt with through an online portal system is pretty efficient.

So, to our dear government who are content on making life cheaper in today’s harsh economy (irrelevant of whether it’s for the votes or for the greater good!) – look closer and focus on the real problem at hand! We know insurers are the top conspirators for referral fees and pushing people in to making claims, so step one is complete the legal ban, and step two is making the process even more efficient.

Category: Banking News, Opinion


View the original article here

Schwartzapfel Partners, Personal Injury Lawyers, Sponsor Labor Conference - Albany Times Union

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

1st Annual Building & Construction Trades Council of Greater New York Brings to Light Safety in Workplace

Hollywood, FL (PRWEB) March 19, 2012

Over 100 labor leaders and their guests were in attendance at the Building & Construction Trades Council of Greater New York and Schwartzapfel Partners, personal injury lawyers, was proud to be a sponsor of this event. It was the first such annual event of its kind, a groundbreaking forum for labor leaders in the Greater New York area.

“It is our hope that by providing a forum, many advances will be made for workers’ rights,” said Steven Schwartzapfel, of Schwartzapfel Partners P.C. “It’s important to support unions and union leaders because they help protect workers against unfair employer practices and make sure that the safety of their members comes first before employer profits.”

The conference was held at The Westin Diplomat Resort in Hollywood, FL. Many of the conference registrants are decision-makers in their respective organizations and some even hold dual roles as union leaders and Taft-Hartley Benefit Fund Trustees. Schwartzapfel Partners P.C. was a proud sponsor of the event and was present for the entire conference.

“We’re proud to sponsor a conference that tackles the important issue of safety in the workplace,” Schwartzapfel added. “Everyone has a right to feel safe at their job. It’s when safety measures fail that personal injury lawyers like myself need to step in and stand up for the working man.”

About Schwartzapfel Partners P.C.
Schwartzapfel Partners P.C. is one of the most prominent and well respected plaintiff personal injury and litigation firms in New York. The firm has handled tens of thousands of cases and helped thousands of clients obtain the money and benefits they deserve. The firm's pledge is to make a difficult situation easier and the firm's lawyers are proud of a success rate of over 98%. Schwartzapfel Partners P.C. fights to protect the rights of those who cannot protect themselves.

The personal injury lawyers at Schwartzapfel Partners focus on all types of personal injury litigation, including vehicle accidents (bus, car, truck, motorcycle, bicycle and pedestrian) medical malpractice, wrongful death, defective products and drugs, construction accidents, workplace accidents, workers’ compensation, Social Security disability, nursing home neglect and abuse, and complex highway design defect cases. To contact the law firm, call (800) 966-4999 or use the firm's online contact form.

For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/prweb2012/3/prweb9303175.htm


View the original article here

For lawyers, it can be tough to be a 'friend of the court' - Washington Post

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

“That’s not the way the statute reads .?.?. that’s carrying it too far,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor objected at one point.

“It seems you can’t separate those two points,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. complained at another.

“It seems to me it’s a question you can’t answer,” Justice Antonin Scalia concluded.

Such can be the lot of the “amici curiae,” or friends of the court, whom the Supreme Court justices tap when they want to hear a side of an issue that no one else involved supports.

And it’s the fate that could await H. Bartow Farr III, who will come before the justices on Wednesday, the third and final day of hearings on the challenge to the 2010 health-care law.

Farr, a private lawyer and longtime member of the Supreme Court bar, will argue that even if the court invalidates the law’s mandate that nearly all Americans obtain insurance or pay a penalty, it should leave the rest of the law intact. (The government argues that if the mandate goes, so should several of the law’s regulations on insurers. The law’s challengers contend that the entire statute should be overturned.)

Long’s presentation on Monday posited that an obscure 19th-century tax law precludes the court from ruling on the insurance mandate at this time.

It’s a rare privilege to be asked to take on such a job. According to a recent study published in the Stanford Law Review, the court has appointed only about 45 amici curiae since 1954 — roughly twice every three terms. (Justices can call on them for a range of reasons, including failure by one of the parties to appear before the court.)

They often pick either seasoned veterans or younger former clerks who they deem worthy of the résuméboost that comes from appearing before the court.

And there’s always the chance that the amicus will be on the winning side of the argument. That’s a prospect that troubled Brian Goldman, the author of the Stanford Law Review study of the use of amici curiae.

Goldman, who declined to comment for this report because he is now employed by the Justice Department, suggested in the study that the court risked running afoul of the Constitution’s stipulation that federal courts should decide only actual controversies.

“To the extent that appointing an amicus enables the Court to resolve legal questions that are not squarely presented by a live controversy, the practice itself should be abandoned, lest the Court appear to be reaching out to address issues that do not arise organically,” he wrote.

But Stephen McAllister did not hesitate when he got the call for a case the court heard last year. A law professor at the University of Kansas, he had already come before the court four times representing clients.

“Maybe there are people who feel they can afford to say no,” he said. “I certainly didn’t. It’s a great honor.”

It was also a daunting mission. The work is unpaid, and without the support staff of a law firm, McAllister had to pull long hours to prepare his briefs and argument.

“It was basically almost three months of work,” he said. “It wasn’t the only thing I was doing, but it took a lot of time.”

Then there was the challenge of defending a position that McAllister himself considered far-fetched at best. “Friends of mine were saying things like, ‘You were dealt a hand with no cards,’?” he said with a laugh.

He said his sympathy has been with Long and Farr this week.

“I empathize because there may have been a moment or two when one of the justices was asking me a question from the bench, not buying the argument I was making, when I just wanted to say, ‘But you asked me to make these arguments,’?” he said, laughing again. “There is a sense of, ‘Don’t be so hard on me. I’m just doing what you asked me to do.

“?‘And I’m doing it pro bono.’?”


View the original article here

Injury lawyers: explaining whiplash claims - Banking Times

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Russell Thomson is an injury claims lawyer working at The Injury Lawyers, who explains that while whiplash is a clear and serious issue, the whole subject has become badly distorted through insurance companies selling customer details for referral fees.

Like Tony Blair and his “Education, Education, Education” speech at the start of Labours last bout of parliamentary power, the topic we’re looking at here is “Whiplash, Whiplash, Whiplash” – it’s all about whiplash!

You have heard all about it in the news, and you may well have experienced it yourself, or know someone who has made a whiplash claim. The fact that remains in today’s society is the real negative viewpoint people have of this injury. So I decided, as a representative of a firm of lawyers that deal with whiplash, and a whiplash sufferer myself, to give you some enlightenment from the other side of the coin; because all you will hear about in the press is everyone slating the validity of whiplash as an injury.

Is whiplash even a real injury?

Well, yes, of course it is. If you grab an elastic band and stretch it, it returns back to normal so long as you haven’t pulled it too far. Which is kind of my point; stretch it too far and you will either shred it or snap it. Pull anything too much and it will eventually ‘give’ and break or stretch too much and cause damage.

There are apparently over 50 muscles in the back structure alone. Now, imagine 50 muscles being stretched beyond their normal range of movement, and hey-ho, you have whiplash! It’s not always just a little bit of an ache that goes away over a few days; it can sometimes be a severely debilitating injury that is caused by the muscles in the neck, back, and shoulders being pulled beyond their normal range of movement.

Upon an impact or a sudden stop, you are thrown forwards and backwards within the restraint of your seatbelt, assuming you are wearing one. This lurch forward is what stretches the many ligaments and tendons in the neck, shoulders and back structure beyond their normal range of movement, resulting in obvious damage to them. You can pull a muscle in your leg from playing football – a similar principle applies. So yes, whiplash is a real injury.

But we hear too often in the news about it being difficult to diagnose. I’m not sure why really, because whiplash is diagnosable – there are physical symptoms that can be felt. A person with whiplash may have stiff areas in the neck, shoulders and back which are definable to the human touch. The stiffness is caused by the damage which was caused by the overstretching of the muscles. Yes, there are occasions where it may be more difficult to see; but with a little common sense and deductive logic, apply the earlier principle of muscles being overstretched in an impact or a sudden stop and its quite clear to understand you can end up with a whiplash injury.

When it comes to making a claim, the injury must be medically assessed to prove its validity. An assessment with a qualified medical expert who has access to the Claimants medical records is a common part of the claims process. A report is completed and the expert will give their opinion as to the severity of the injury and the affects it has had on the Claimants life. The expert is entirely independent – their duty is to the court, NOT to the Claimant; so there is no bias. They get paid for their work either way, and they must give their professionally qualified opinion. They will only agree with what is reasonable in the report.

Surrounding the “whiplash epidemic” or “whiplash problem” as its often termed is the government’s movement to ban personal injury referral fees that are thought to be at the centre of a surge in whiplash claims over the last decade. However, there appears to be a cultural trend that has crossed over in to the campaign to rid the UK of the referral fee system which focuses on whiplash itself being the problem; which it isn’t.

Yes, whiplash claims can be sometimes difficult to prove; however, former Justice Secretary Mr Jack Straw has lost a great deal of respect for the following quotation from a speech regarding the bill in the House of Commons last year:

“Often such claims are for whiplash, which is not so much an injury, more a profitable invention of the human imagination—undiagnosable except by third-rate doctors in the pay of the claims management companies or personal injury lawyers”

This is what I will professionally term as a “seriously stupid statement”. The above is not true. As I said earlier, whiplash IS diagnosable, and it CAN be felt to the human touch. The experts that are instructed are not “in the pay of the claims management companies or personal injury lawyers”; in fact, their fees are recovered from the insurers, and the expert, who must be independent, must be agreed with the insurers before instruction. The insurers have the right to object to any proposed experts, and can even get their own medical evidence for claims!

Quickly turning to my own experience of whiplash, which I am still suffering from since last May (although one reason may be an unrelated leg injury I have from this January that may have exacerbated the whiplash through the use of crutches for months), I was seen by a Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon with all the qualifications to boot.

I therefore ask the right honourable gentleman speaker Mr Jack Straw if he is seriously suggesting that the Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon I saw for my medical report whom confirmed my whiplash is nothing more than a “third-rate doctor”!??

Furthermore, was the qualified physiotherapist I received treatment from also some useless “third-rate” practitioner whom just wasted her time poking and prodding my back for no good reason?? Were these two medical professionals both lying when they could feel the damage in my back muscles which I still get trouble with today, and never had issues with prior to the accident? Am I, Mr Straw, also lying through my back teeth because I want a quick cash payout for an invented injury?

Are you calling us all liars, and claiming that the firm I work for is fraudulently suing the bus company responsible for my injuries??

The real issue is simple – due to the referral fee system that insurance companies push people in to making claims through, we see a higher proportion of fraudulent or frivolous claims. There could easily be a small minority who could try and “milk the system” but that doesn’t mean all whiplash sufferers are doing the same. There are, and have been in the past, unbelievable amounts of people cheating the benefits system, for one example. The simple fact is that these are not symptoms of a “whiplash problem” but rather more they are the common symptoms associated with anything that involves financial gain in today’s society. You simply cannot escape fraud!

So what about the lawyers claiming high fees for whiplash claims? Well as a matter of fact we lawyers are capped to restricted legal fees, so that’s not really an issue. The fact does remain however that a lawyer is needed to protect the rights of the Claimant from being fobbed off by the insurers.

Third Party Capture is a term used to describe the insurers of the party at fault contacting the victim to settle the claim directly. The amount of times we get calls from people who have been suffering for two months and the insurers are sticking to their offer of £500.00 is unreal. The insurers know full well that a two month whiplash injury is worth more than £500.00, yet they see the opportunity to save themselves some money by purposefully trying to under settle a claim. Where is the justice in that?

In the past, insurers would pay independent companies and agents to settle claims directly with the innocent victims. The cheaper the claim was settled for, the more commission these agents would receive. It’s no secret that insurers have, and will continue to try and save money at the expense of the victims to which they are legally responsible for paying out. Think of it like this – you get your vehicle assessed for valuation of repairs before you settle the claim with the insurers; why wouldn’t you do the same for your injury? This simply requires a lawyer.

So how do we solve the problem?

Well, realistically, there isn’t a problem per-se. There are no more problems than there already are in other situations in life were people can “milk the system”. All this talk of cutting whiplash claims and making it harder to make a claim will only serve to be an injustice for the majority genuine whiplash victims who have suffered at the hands of a negligent driver. We have car insurance for the sole purposes of making a claim from – it’s there to be used! Perhaps what we should be focusing on is making sure there are less dangerous drivers on the road, and improving safety in vehicles to prevent or reduce the damage a whiplash injury can cause. Research is already underway in to ways that vehicles can prevent a whiplash injury, or reduce the affects.

We can of course continue to improve efficiency in the way claims are dealt with, but the new system we have had since 2010 whereby legal fees are further reduced and claims are dealt with through an online portal system is pretty efficient.

So, to our dear government who are content on making life cheaper in today’s harsh economy (irrelevant of whether it’s for the votes or for the greater good!) – look closer and focus on the real problem at hand! We know insurers are the top conspirators for referral fees and pushing people in to making claims, so step one is complete the legal ban, and step two is making the process even more efficient.

Category: Banking News, Opinion


View the original article here

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Lawyers boycott courts to condemn Maleer killings - Pakistan Daily Times

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Lawyers boycott courts to condemn Maleer killings

Staff Report

LAHORE: The lawyer community of the metropolis boycotted all court proceedings on Monday to condemn the recent killings of Maleer Bar Association?s former president Advocate Salahuddin and his son Ali Raza in Karachi.

Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and Punjab Bar Council (PBC) had issued calls for the strike ? SCBA for a half-day strike while PBC announced a full-day boycott of courts.

The lawyers stayed away from courts throughout the day except for showing up for a few urgent matters. However, there was no general house meeting of any bar in the city and condemnation statements were issued by lawyers? representatives.

SCBA Acting President Imrana Parween Baloch said the legal fraternity was united and would fight for its rights. She said the government had failed to provide protection to the legal fraternity and to the general public. The government had failed to run the affairs of the country, since the citizens were deprived of both basic utilities and rights, she added, demanding that the culprits be immediately nabbed and tried under terrorism law.

Separately, Lahore High Court Bar Association President Shahram Sarwar Ch, Secretary Sardar Akbar Ali Dogar, Vice President Hafizur Rehman Chaudhry and Finance Secretary Rafila Anjum Minhas also expressed grief over the lawyers? killings and demanded federal and provincial governments to arrest the killers within the next 24 hours. They said the whole legal fraternity was standing in support of the Maleer lawyers and would ensure arrest of the culprits.

Home | Lahore


View the original article here

Zimbabwe Lawyers Want Treason Charges Against Activists Dropped - Voice of America

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
In the first treason trial to be held in the second city of Bulawayo, the three activists, Paul Siwela, John Gazi and Charles Thomas, are being accused of distributing fliers calling for an uprising against the government

Lawyers representing three activist members of the Zimbabwe pressure group, Mthwakazi Liberation Front, say they will apply for dismissal of the case because of inconsistent evidence.

In the first treason trial to be held in the second city of Bulawayo, the three activists, Paul Siwela, John Gazi and Charles Thomas, are being accused of distributing fliers calling for an uprising against the government. They deny the charge.

Lawyer Lucas Nkomo tells VOA's Chris Gande the case against the three has literally crumbled after two star witnesses gave inconsistent evidence.

“The first two witnesses denied that they had ever seen the accused people thereby weakening the case against the trio,” said Nkomo.

The state alleges that the fliers the three were distributing urged the people Matabeleland to rise against the government.

The three argue the state misinterpreted the message on their fliers.

Nkomo says witnesses who have taken the stand so far have not only weakened the state case but showed that no crime was committed.

“The arresting officers also gave conflicting? and inconsistent evidence that was not of any assistance to the state case,” said Nkomo.

Justice Ndou, sitting with assessors Jongilizwe Sobantu and Phanuel Damba, have postponed the case to April 23.


View the original article here

Monday, March 26, 2012

Injury lawyers: compensation culture driven by insurance companies - Insurance Daily

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Russell Thomson from The Injury Lawyers explains how insurance companies are driving compensation culture for whiplash claims in a bid to chase referral fees. More from the injury lawyers injury claims website: The?Injury Lawyers.

Whiplash claims, whiplash compensation, whiplash injuries – or Whiplash Cash, Whiplash Epidemic, and “the weakest necks in Britain” as the press often title it; whiplash has not escaped the news over the last decade as compensation claims continue to rise together with our car insurance premiums as well.

It’s obvious to anyone that it’s all getting way out of hand!

But what’s the reality behind all this? What can we do to solve the problem? We often hear in the news from the insurance companies complaining about higher volumes of claims causing premiums to rise. We absolutely love a good scandal here in the UK – making one out of whiplash is just way too easy to do.

So, why are the government wanting to crack down so hard on whiplash? Are we facing a real compensation culture? And what should be done about whiplash claims to solve the problem?

Let’s Face Facts – It’s a Hard Knock Economy…

As an economist by education, it’s easy for me to try and look at the bigger picture in these tight financial times. Let’s face it – we can’t afford to be paying out huge premiums for insurance. It makes anyone angry to think their premiums are going up and up; it makes me personally angry knowing I have to pay more and more! The insurers have been quick to answer our concerns – “the surge in whiplash claims is increasing everyone’s premiums!!!” All of our purse strings are as tight as we can pull them at the moment.

Naturally, the government want to do something about it. To be able to say to the people “we will take this whiplash problem seriously and do something about it to save all your premiums being too high” is a powerful political tool. We, the British people, like I said earlier, love a good a scandal; and generally like to have a good dig out our government whilst we’re at it! When they turn round and tell us they can save us some cash by solving what seems to be a huge problem in our society today, we’re quick to lap it up and prepare our ballot choices for the next election.

We call it “the compensation culture”. It’s a great catch phrase, isn’t it? But to really understand a problem, we have to delve a little deeper and try to understand what the underlying issues really are…

The Compensation Culture Explained

If you have read the government reports surrounding the Compensation Culture, namely the Lord Young and Lord Jackson reports, then you may well know what I’m going to say next. Amazingly, there is no such thing as a compensation culture! It’s actually a media fuelled myth that was formed in the wake of the whole whiplash problem I’m writing about now, together with the whole “where there’s a blame, there’s a claim” idea! Claims are on the rise, and insurance premiums are on the rise too – that natural assumption it’s because people are claiming left right and centre is the obvious conclusion we draw.

What we should be doing is looking deeper in to the underlying issues; the real problem. The first point of call is to ask one simple question – how has this all happened? How did we get ourselves in to this predicament? Answer this one easy question, and the answer is pretty simple to see.

Why are there more people claiming? Well, it’s safe to say that more people are aware that they have the right to make a claim for compensation, and will therefore use the human right they have to claim from a policy of insurance that covers injuries to third party victims. Which is a quick point in itself – insurance is there to cover people for damages, so why shouldn’t we claim from it??

There is certainly far more advertising for whiplash claims than there used to be. Aside from the adverts on the TV and the radio, type “Whiplash” in to Google or any other search engine and see the flood of results from companies offering you their services for a compensation claim.

But there is something far more sinister at work when it comes to whiplash claims. There is something out there that is the real reason why people are making more claims, including a minority making fraudulent ones. Its two simple words that are so powerful they have the ability, when utilised in the right way, to make millions and millions for companies that involve themselves in the practice. These two simple yet powerful words are “Referral Fees”?

Referral Fees – The Real Problem

The real reason why there are so many people being pushed in to making compensation claims is because of the practice of personal injury referral fees. Whiplash claims in many instances are relatively easy to win – a rear end collision accident is basically money just waiting to be earned by the solicitor who will take it on. This salient fact has been picked up on and turned in to one of the biggest money making schemes in the last century.?

If you hold the details of a whiplash accident victim, you are potentially holding £1,500.00 of legal fees in your hands. £1,500.00 is a fair bit of money. You approach anyone in the street and say to them “would you like £1,500.00?” and you’ll find the majority of people would be more than happy to oblige.

You tell a law firm that you can give them £1,500.00 for nothing and you would have one happy law firm. You tell them you can give them £1,500.00 in exchange for £800.00 and you still have a happy law firm. Can you see where I’m going with this?

The personal details of an accident victim who was not at fault in an incident is worth potentially a lot of money. Insurance companies, garages, breakdown and recovery firms, and the scrupulous claim and accident management companies have all clocked on to this; and they’re all making millions of pounds from it.

The most common one is Legal Expenses Insurance, or Motor Legal Protection as it’s sometimes called. The vast majority of people with a motor insurance policy will probably have this as an added extra, or will be physically paying for it as an addition to their insurance policy. Your insurance company will tell you that this vital addition to your policy means you have the benefit of legal insurance for a claim for compensation should you ever be in an accident.

Now, don’t get me wrong, it is a form of insurance; but when your insurers pass your details over to one of their panel of approved lawyers under the insurance scheme, they receive a healthy referral fee or administration fee for their troubles. Amazingly, this can be in the region of £800.00 to £1,000.00.

So, to break it down in extremely simple terms, if you have an accident and your insurers pass you over to a personal injury lawyer, your insurers could receive up to £1,000.00 for doing so. They are essentially “selling” your claim over to a law firm. Given that one of the first points of contact you make after an accident is to your own insurers, they can get the deal done there and then without delay; leaving the accident victim without the opportunity to even think about whether they are going to make or claim, nor who they might instruct to deal with a case.

If your insurers don’t catch it in time, the recovery firm you use may well also refer your details over to a law firm for a handsome payout instead – or the garage you take your car to, or even the police according to some sources in the past. Ultimately, anyone who knows about your accident can simply refer your details over to a claims company or a law firm and they can swoop your claim within hours or days.

I bought a new car and received a free “Accident Assistance” pack which basically told me to call this one helpline number if I am ever in an accident. Why? Because they will know right away if I have a claim and will be able to refer the case over to a lawyer for cold hard cash! You really can’t escape this nowadays; and you probably don’t even know it.

Now, let’s say for arguments sake this practice doesn’t exist. If it didn’t, the amount of people who would not even consider making a claim would be huge. Many wouldn’t even think about it at all! So it’s safe to say that the increase in claims is actually down to the fact that insurers and anyone else involved in the road accident process are pushing people in to claims when they may well have never even considered making a claim until they are contacted by someone telling them they could claim thousands of pounds in compensation.

Hey – we’re in a recession! Who the hell wouldn’t accept the opportunity to get thousands of pounds for a compensation claim!?

Insurers Referral Fees Exposed – The Insurers “Dirty Little Secret”

As it so happens, this was all exposed in the media last year, which for independent law firms like us who do not, and never have, paid for claims by way of referral fees, is great news! The simple fact is that not all law firms buy claims from insurers and claims companies as we don’t believe in the practice whatsoever. All our clients come to us directly for our reputation after seeking advice about whether they can make a claim for the whiplash they are suffering.

Last year former Justice Secretary Mr Jack Straw brought to light and blasted what he has termed as the “huge racket” of insurers passing on details to personal injury lawyers for extortionate fees. The reports confirm that Mr Straw has said that “the practice had driven a surge in no-win, no-fee claims this year which put up premiums – all with the insurers’ knowledge”.

So, as you can see, it’s the insurers themselves that are akin to this apparent problem.

My own insurers tried to sell me Legal Expenses Insurance as part of my policy at least four times when I switched over to them. The lady simply persisted and persisted, putting me on hold several times whilst she, I assume, was telling her supervisor she was having difficulty selling it to me. In the end I told her outright “it’s my job to stop it; I work for an independent personal injury law firm and know all about the referral fee scams!” Her response in all honesty was classic – “oh… erm, never mind then…”

They did try again when I renewed. I got a call from a pleasant sounding young man asking if Id received my new policy documents through the post, before he quickly said “oh I’ve just noticed you don’t have legal protection on your policy, which is quite a problem for people if you have an accident”. It was 9:30am in the morning and I didn’t have the patience when I told him “the real problem is insurers selling peoples details to law firms for cash; I work for a law firm, so I think I’ll do without it thanks.”

It seems we are facing situations were insurers are so desperate to sell details to lawyers for claims, we are facing potentially fraudulent claims from pushy insurance companies. Whilst whiplash is a real and difficult injury to live with (I know, I’ve still got mine!), people are being pushed in to wrongfully cashing in on it.

Investigations from Mr Straw brought him to the Association of British Insurers, and two of the UK’s largest insurance companies, whom admitted to selling on their own customers personal details to solicitors for profit.

“I went to see the Association of British Insurers (ABI), and senior executives of two of Britain’s largest motor insurers,” Straw wrote in The Times.

“I asked them. A long pause, a look of embarrassment, then one of these executives said: ‘This is the industry’s dirty secret. It’s we, the insurance companies, who sell on this personal information.’?

“It is gobsmacking,” Straw said. “The insurers are complicit in something that is against their interests. In my view, what they are doing, in principle, is contrary to the spirit of data protection.”

The above, I believe, pretty much says it all.

Referral Fees to be Banned – Problem Solved?

Both the Law Society and the Bar Council have recommended in the past that referral fees be stopped on the grounds that they have the potential to limit access to justice and reduce the quality of legal services on offer.

Following news of the pending ban, Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly has also spoken out and confirmed “It’s certainly a racket. It’s a sick culture that we have to turn round.” The bill has been passed through government, and it is now just a matter of time before they are banned outright. This could help to solve the problem by reducing the amount of claims as people will not be pushed in to making a claim by insurers and companies looking to make a quick buck from selling their claim to a law firm.

Chairman of the Bar, Peter Lodder QC, has also spoken out, saying that referral fees have “no place in a fair and open justice system… They are bribes and add an unnecessary cost to litigation.”

Are you saying that the insurers are actually to blame for the surge in increased claims and premium rises then?

Yes. I am. I told you that whiplash claims and the rising compensation culture would be fully exposed. But what has been exposed is probably not quite what you expected to hear. Just look at the facts we have before us, and you tell me who is really to blame for all of this…

Category: Insurance Blog, Insurance News, Legal News


View the original article here

Personal injury lawyers Schwartzapfel partners, sponsor of the work Conference-Albany Times Union

1. the annual amount of the building and construction trades Council of greater New York provides safety in the workplace of the light

Hollywood, FL (PRWEB) 19. March 2012

More than 100 Labor leaders and their presence in the construction of the Building and were available on the back of the Council of greater New York and, in the case of personal injury lawyers, Schwartzapfel partners was a proud sponsor of this event. It was the first such annual event of its kind, the uraauurtavia of the work of the Forum of the leaders of the greater New York area.

"It is the hope that by providing a platform for many of the advances shall be made in the workers ' rights," said Steven Schwartzapfel, Schwartzapfel partners P.C. "it is important to support the trade unions and Union leaders, because they help to protect workers against unfair practices on the part of the employer, and then make sure that the safety of their members, in particular the employer's profits before."

The Conference was held at The Westin Diplomat Resort, Hollywood, FL. many registrants are the Conference of the parties, organizations, policy makers, and some even hold the dual roles of the Union and of the Taft-Hartley to the benefit of the Fund Trustees. Proud sponsor of the event was Schwartzapfel Partners P.C. and the size of the Conference, the presence of.

"We are proud to sponsor the Conference, which deals with the important issue of the occupational safety and health," Schwartzapfel is added. "Everyone has the right to feel safe in their work. It is when the risk of personal injury lawyers, such as yourself, is the phase of the working Man to stand. "

Information about the partners P.C. Schwartzapfel
Schwartzapfel Partners P.C. is visible and following the plaintiff personal injury and business litigation in New York. An investment firm shall be dealt with in the tens of thousands of cases and helped thousands get the money and they deserve the benefits to customers. To the extent that the company is in a difficult situation is easier and the company's lawyers are proud of the success rate of more than 98%. Schwartzapfel Partners P.C. fights for those who cannot protect themselves, in order to protect the rights of.

In the case of personal injury lawyers at the partners to focus on all types of personal injury Schwartzapfel litigation matters, including insurance cover (bus, car, truck, motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian), medical malpractice, wrongful death, defective products and drugs, construction accidents, occupational accidents, workers compensation, social security disability, nursing home neglect and abuse, and in cases of complex highway design. Contact law firm, call the 800 966-4999, or through the contact form on your company's network.

The version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/prweb2012/3/prweb9303175.htm


View the original article here

In the case of personal injury lawyers for a dial-up connection and Dial-Randolph County Herald-Tribune (blog)


SOAP on a regular basis, is always a good wants to curry favor the opposite sex, but of course the soap brand is capable of providing magic potion, so that men in the force from a natural phenomenon of women.
The playlist has launched the "magnetic field" of the product and the company to use the language and the jaw ad campaign to sell the product. The company describes the "magnetic field" "received by the Pheromone attraction to a body Wash." The instructions in step 4 reads "back to stand and watch the magic happen."
Of course, the ad campaign is not meant to be taken literally, but appears to be three different lawyers, including one of the Chicago, have been filed against the soap company thought to be misleading information about a product's ability to attract women in public.
These lawyers found that actually people tell the Court that they bought the "magnetic field", they believed, would make the product very attractive to women. I have to wonder if these people believe that the consumption of the Dos Equis most interesting men in the world, or that makes them really is a talking baby, which makes use of the E-shop.
Is not a group of outraged people, who believe that they need to use the "magnetic field", before the departure of their parent's basement and the wonders they shall be the date on which the Star Trek Convention.
The lawsuit is not legal, but a payday of lawyers. Lawyers hope that Dial the appropriate case, to get it to go away. They Get just the price, even though the lawyers within walking distance of the hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars. This is the jackpot at their worst.


View the original article here

In Health Care Case, Lawyers Train for 3-Day Marathon - New York Times

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Last week, there were so many of the mock arguments that lawyers call moot courts that they threatened to exhaust something that had never been thought in short supply: Washington lawyers willing to pretend to be Supreme Court justices.

The problem, said Paul D. Clement, who represents the 26 states challenging the law, was not just the length of the arguments the court will hear, but the variety of topics to be addressed.

The law itself is a sprawling revision of the health care system meant to provide coverage to tens of millions of previously uninsured Americans by imposing new requirements on states, employers and insurance companies and, through what has been called the individual mandate, by requiring most Americans to obtain insurance or pay a penalty.

The decision in the case will have enormous practical consequences for how health care is delivered in the United States. It is likely to land in June, with large repercussions for both Mr. Obama and his Republican challenger just before the two parties hold their nominating conventions.

The justices have broken the case into four discrete issues, scheduling a separate session for each, for a total of six hours, the most in one case in more than 40 years. Mr. Clement, like his principal adversary, Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr., will be arguing three times.

Walter Dellinger, who was acting solicitor general in the Clinton administration, said he was worried about “the enormous endurance challenge this will be for Verrilli and Clement.” Mr. Dellinger, who has argued more than 20 cases in the Supreme Court, said making even a single 30-minute presentation is draining.

“The day or two after a Supreme Court argument, I just basically collapse,” Mr. Dellinger said.

The central issue in the case, to be argued for two hours on Tuesday, is whether the individual mandate is constitutional.

But first, on Monday, the justices will hear 90 minutes of arguments from three lawyers about whether they should be hearing the case at all.

An 1867 federal law, the Anti-Injunction Act, bars suits “for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax.” The federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., and a prominent federal appeals court judge in Washington have issued opinions saying that the 1867 law means a decision in the health care case must be deferred until 2015, when Americans will first be penalized if they do not have health insurance.

But neither the Obama administration nor the parties challenging the law agree with that ruling. So the court appointed a Washington lawyer, Robert A. Long, to speak on behalf of that argument. The court makes such appointments every year or so, and the practice has been the subject of some skeptical academic commentary.

Mr. Long will be followed on Monday by Mr. Verrilli and a lawyer for the private challengers, Gregory G. Katsas.

The Obama administration initially agreed that the court could not rule on challenges to the law for a few more years, but it reversed course in the appeals courts. It has since relinquished other opportunities to slow down the case and insists it wants a prompt decision.

Mr. Long was one of three lawyers who presented mock arguments in the grand ceremonial courtroom at the Supreme Court Institute at the Georgetown University Law Center. On other days, the moot court program there helped prepare Mr. Clement, twice, as well as Michael A. Carvin, who represents private challengers to the law.

Mr. Clement and Mr. Carvin will face Mr. Verrilli on Tuesday for the main event, the argument over whether the requirement to obtain insurance was authorized by the Constitution as a regulation of interstate commerce or by the power to levy taxes. The administration says the health care law is well within the powers granted by the Constitution, while the challengers say it plainly exceeds what the federal government may do.

For Wednesday, the court has scheduled a double feature.

In the morning, the justices will hear 90 minutes of arguments about what should happen if they strike down the mandate. The federal appeals court in Atlanta, whose decision is under review, ruled that it was possible to remove just the mandate and leave the balance of the law intact.

As with the 1867 law, neither side agrees with that ruling. So here, too, the court has appointed an outside lawyer, H. Bartow Farr III, to argue the point.

Mr. Clement will contend that the entire law must fall. A colleague of Mr. Verrilli’s in the solicitor general’s office, Edwin S. Kneedler, will argue for a middle ground, saying that most of the law should stand but that two other provisions — one forbidding insurers to turn away applicants, the other barring them from taking account of pre-existing conditions — are intertwined with the mandate and would have to fall along with it.

On Wednesday afternoon, the two main lawyers, Mr. Verrilli and Mr. Clement, will return for a one-hour encore, this time to argue over whether Congress exceeded its constitutional authority in expanding the eligibility and coverage thresholds that states must adopt to remain eligible for Medicaid, the federal-state program that provides health care to poor and disabled people.

There is room for only about 400 people in the courtroom, and prominent lawyers and politicians have been scrambling for tickets. The court has set aside about 60 seats for members of the public, and the line started forming on Friday morning.

Emmarie Huetteman contributed reporting.


View the original article here